Search for: "Shirk v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 106
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2011, 10:40 am
United States issued last Thursday, has quickly received a fair amount of buzz in the blogosphere. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 2:02 pm
We are getting close to a quarter of a century since the United States Supreme Court outlined the requirements of gatekeeping, in Daubert v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
All the while, of course, the national citizenry has basically remained asleep, acceding to Madison’s devout wish, in Federalist 40, that they “venerate” the United States Constitution and, in effect, never even think of having a second national convention. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:34 am
§ 332 states, “Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may … use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion” (emphasis added). [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 12:10 pm
” Simply put, this means that no member of the United States government is above the rule of law. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 12:10 am
Indeed, Pryor cites FN19 of United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 1:37 pm
Brinckerhoff v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 7:00 am
In Massachusetts v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 4:32 am
The oral argument transcript in California v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
By 1906, the Intercollegiate Athletic Association of the United States (IAAUS) was born. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am
The Reporter’s point goes directly to the cross-examination excuse for not shirking the gatekeeping function. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 7:29 am
United States, 312 F.2d 418, 426 (Ct. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
See Ware v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
See Ware v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:25 am
In the long litany of head-scratching moments emerging from our growing knowledge about the highest-ranking Republican in the United States government, I was both confused and amused when I saw this in The Guardian. [read post]
26 May 2009, 5:34 pm
State, supra, 744 A.2d 864, 886-889; Lewis v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:11 pm
The three sources of international law are stated and defined in the Restatement (Third) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States (R3dFRLUS), Section 102. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 3:35 pm
The next question asked about the landmark case of Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
Twitter’s policy states that users “may not threaten violence against an individual or a group of people” and the social network prohibits “the glorification of violence. [read post]
