Search for: "Shook v. USA" Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2008, 6:47 pm
" The program will run from 1:00 to 2:30 PM ET, and will cover the following topics:Examination of what the 2007 decision in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 6:07 am by Beck, et al.
In Goodridge v Pfizer Canada Inc., 2010 ONSC 1095 (Feb. 18, 2010), the plaintiffs claimed injuries from off-label use of Neurontin and its generic version. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 9:00 am
            Last February, the United States Supreme Court added another layer to its punitive damages jurisprudence in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:24 pm by legalinformatics
Jason Jordan, University of North Texas: De Jure Blackness: Racialization in Brown v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 7:43 am by PRATER, DUNCAN & CRAIG 770-253-7778
Cofer, Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P., Kansas City, Mo. 12 $142,089,276 RICO Kaiser Foundation Health Plan v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., 2010 WL 2640170, at *2 (W.D. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 10:26 am by Steve Hall
They point to an April execution in Arizona, where an inmate shook for several seconds after receiving a lethal dose of pentobarbital. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:08 pm by Greg Mersol
Ohio 2001) (stating that a Daubert analysis was "not warranted" at the certification stage"), aff'd, 370 F.3d 565 (6th Cir. 2007); Shook v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:54 pm by Bexis
  And in cases where punitive damages are sought, consolidation of multiple plaintiffs into one trial is, in our view, a per se violation of Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
Second, although Britain did indeed intervene in Europe in 1939, in the shape of declaring war on Germany, it is extremely doubtful that it could have emerged on the winning side in 1945 without two other interventions: those of the Soviet Union and the USA, both in 1941. [read post]