Search for: "Shorter v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,481
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2008, 11:26 am
SENTENCINGUnited States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 11:06 am
A recent decision by a federal court in the Southern District of New York, HLP Properties, LLC v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 11:07 am
This is shorter than in most states. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 am
In Tapia v. [read post]
18 Jan 2020, 4:45 am
A lot shorter than the 2 books, and those books made me see why it's not a good idea to abolish the Electoral College. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 10:47 am
Montgomery v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 6:09 pm
Such was our impression of a quite skeptical, forty-five minute back-and-forth between the appeals court’s active members and the government’s attorney, Ian Gershengorn; and of a much gentler, shorter dialogue between the judges and the defendant’s lawyer, Michel Paradis. [read post]
11 Oct 2006, 5:57 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 6:00 am
United States and Kimbrough v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 11:10 am
United States, as three other circuits hold; and (2) whether a district court may decline to address a defendant’s nonfrivolous argument that a shorter sentence is necessary to avoid “unwarranted sentence disparities,” 18 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 2:15 am
The points to consider were stated to be:“(i) the financial position of the parties (s289(2) 1988 Act). [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 9:21 am
As the world's news cycle grows shorter by the day, events with wide-ranging consequences scarcely have a twenty-four-hour lifespan in the headlines. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 11:17 am
Texas, United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 3:08 pm
Dilworth Co., 322 U.S 327 (1944); General Trading Co. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 4:50 am
State v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 4:28 am
It is styled, Charles Van Tassel v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 11:33 am
In Dermody v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 1:24 pm
As stated in McCormick v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:09 am
Co., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 12:45 pm
In the recent Wirth v. [read post]