Search for: "Simmons v. Cohen"
Results 1 - 20
of 33
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2011, 9:24 pm
Ben Cohen (The Charles Hamilton Houston Institute for Race and Justice and The Justice Center's Capital Appeals Project) have posted Redemption Song: Graham v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 1:00 am
Simmons, 2005 (and an article from the NYT analyzing the court opinion) The SCOTUS decision that struck down the death penalty for mentally ill folks: Atkins v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:39 pm
For in Miller v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 7:33 am
” Meanwhile, both the Boston Globe and the Christian Science Monitor have stories on the Court’s denial of cert. in Simmons v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
At issue in Simmons v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 4:15 am
The defendant established that the plaintiff would be unable to prove that he would have been successful in the forfeiture action but for the alleged negligence (see Simmons v Edelstein, 32 AD3d 464, 465; Lichtenstein v Barenbaum, 23 AD3d 440; Edwards v Haas, Greenstein, Samson, Cohen & Gerstein, P.C., 17 AD3d 517, 519). [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Cohen & Robert J. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 3:09 am
For example, "[a] cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice requires proof of three elements: (1) that the defendant failed to exercise that degree of care, skill, and diligence commonly possessed and exercised by an ordinary member of the legal community, (2) that such negligence was the proximate cause of the actual damages sustained by the plaintiff, and (3) that, but for the defendant's negligence, the plaintiff would have been successful in the underlying action"… [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:43 am
As usual, Cohen analysis is a must-read. [read post]
30 Jul 2022, 6:01 am
Matt Perault detailed the shifting partisan fault lines in speech policy after Dobbs v. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 8:09 am
” And the latest from Bill Freivogel: Simmons v. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:28 am
To establish causation, a plaintiff must show that he or she would have prevailed in the underlying action, or would not have incurred any damages but for the attorney's negligence (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d at 442; Davis v Klein, 88 NY2d 1008, 1009-1010; Lamanna v Pearson & Shapiro, 43 AD3d 1111; Cohen v Wallace & Minchenberg, 39 AD3d 691). [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 5:32 pm
Simmons. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 11:57 am
District Court judge authorizing the use of a geofence warrant in the Jan. 6 prosecution case United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 6:31 am
Simmons - UP 200 with 97% in PA-08 Patrick Murphy v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
Snippets can be downloaded here: http://www.mbhb.com/snippets/bilski Topics include: Viewpoints on Life After Bilski v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 4:27 pm
For wage and hour attorneys, Wednesday's hearing in Murphy v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 8:17 am
David Stone from Simmons & Simmons was up next, saying he was about to fuse Joe Cohen's speech with Muskar's to help brands implement protection of their IP before getting to the point of litigation. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Simmons, 140 F.R.D. 416, 424 (D. [read post]
23 May 2021, 4:08 pm
, Raphael Cohen-Almagor, University of Hull, Natalina Stamile, Federal University of Parana (UFPR) Next Week In the Courts On 24 May 2021 Nicklin J will hand down judgment in The Mayor and Commonalty and Citizens of the City of London v Persons and will hear consequential argument in a number of related cases. [read post]
