Search for: "Simmons v. Superior Court" Results 1 - 20 of 67
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2024, 11:03 am by Giles Peaker
Mason v 1) Olivera and 2) Santana, Claim no: K2PP0132 (15th December 2023, County Court at Clerkenwell and Shoreditch) Our grateful thanks to Garden Court Chambers for details of this judgment on a housing conditions counterclaim to a claim for possession. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:53 am by Alex Phipps
Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005), holding death sentences for juveniles violated the Eighth Amendment; Miller v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Tad Lipsky
It did not consider or endorse any specific legislation, but the pathway suggested was reasonably clear from the relentless criticism of economic writings, judicial opinions (including most Supreme Court antitrust opinions dating from General Dynamics), and other landmark scholarship of antitrust law and economics of the past half-century. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 11:24 am by Jacquelyn Greene
Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005), the Supreme Court banned the death penalty for crimes committed by anyone under the age of 18. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 10:18 am by NARF
Guzman (Economic Development; Tribal Recognition) Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 8:38 am by Russell Knight
A divorce judge will be aware that a litigant is, essentially, writing a report to his or her superiors while they conduct their case and object to their opponent’s case. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 10:35 am
Superior Court (1959) 52 Cal.2d 373 (Simmons). [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”[v] This means compliance must be shown not only for plaintiff Jones but also for every offer and every sale in the “offering. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 3:03 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Simmons, was fond of admonishing his charges to “think it through” before hastily proceeding to any solution. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 1:21 pm by Unknown
Statements implying superiority where the differences in adverse reactions are not clinically meaningful would be misleading. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 7:26 pm by Francis Pileggi
Justices disagree The high court disagreed, finding that under Superior Court Civil Rule 9(b), Knight sufficiently alleged that Simmons falsely told him Jive had limited buyout funds and would use them on a first-come, first served basis. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 4:00 pm by Stefan Kimpton
As a recent decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice – Johal v Simmons da Silva LLP, 2016 ONSC 7835 – reminds us, employers ought to exercise caution before accepting a resignation from an employee who quits suddenly following an emotional outburst at work. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 3:31 pm by James S. Friedman, LLC
Friedman LLC represents juveniles charged with offenses in the Juvenile Part of the Superior Court, Family Division, and in the Criminal Part of the Superior Court, Law Division. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 3:31 pm by James S. Friedman, LLC
Friedman LLC represents juveniles charged with offenses in the Juvenile Part of the Superior Court, Family Division, and in the Criminal Part of the Superior Court, Law Division. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Nor does the Provincial Court as an institution have a lis with the superior courts on any issue. [read post]