Search for: "Simmons v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 414
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2014, 9:24 am
Simmons v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 10:03 am
Simmons v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 10:16 am
In Americans United for Separation of Church & State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:28 am
Rev. 743, 752-53 (2005); see also, e.g., United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 5:25 pm
The United States Supreme Court in Jones v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 2:40 am
The court noted that '(a)lthough minor, (spitting) is an application of force to the body of the victim, a bodily contact highly offensive...' 183 Misc2d at 834, citing United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 10:57 am
United States, a U.S. treaty-power case. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:37 pm
., patent or trade mark infringement, (2) importation, sale for importation, or sale after importation into the United States of the accused products, and (3) the existence of a domestic industry relating to the product in question. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 10:57 am
United States, 320 U.S. 1, 60–61 (1943) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting in part) (“it is an old observation that the training of Anglo‐American judges ill fits them to discharge the duties cast upon them by patent legis‐lation”); Parke‐Davis & Co. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 4:42 am
Id. at 1167–68 (quoting from and relying on Simmons v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 9:50 am
In Nollan v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 9:50 am
In Nollan v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 6:45 am
Simmons-Harris, 536 U.S. 639 (2002) (No U.S. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 9:01 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Simmons Co. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:34 am
On Wednesday, June 26, he shared his strong disagreement with the majority’s ruling striking down a portion of the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:36 pm
The United States Supreme Court in the case of Roper v. [read post]
Bowman v Monsanto: the US Supreme Court rules on patent exhaustion and replication of patented seeds
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States delivered its long-awaited judgment in the case of Bowman v Monsanto Co. et Al., unanimously ruling that 'patent exhaustion does not permit a farmer to reproduce patented seeds through planting and harvesting without the patent holder's permission'. [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:30 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 2:00 pm
Simmons, 560 F.3d 98, 108 (2d Cir. 2009) (refusal to remove hands from pocket); United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:00 am
As the Supreme Court said in United States v. [read post]
