Search for: "Singh v Brown" Results 1 - 20 of 65
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2017, 6:45 am by MBettman
State v Brown,  2003-Ohio-3931 (syllabus) (Section 14, Article I of the Ohio Constitution provides greater protection than the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution against warrantless arrests for minor misdemeanors.) [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
HaiderDoctorji the Divorcé: Understanding Bhagat Singh Thind Through His Marriage to Inez BuelenPhilip DeslippeUS v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 3:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
., LLC v Brown  2021 NY Slip Op 06167  Decided on November 10, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department is a novel defense to a claim of deceit. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
s other leading “fair comment” case – BCA v Singh ([2010] EWCA Civ 350). [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:29 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The court remitted to the High Court the question whether Mr Lumba was detained for longer than a reasonable period in breach of the Hardial Singh principles. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 12:24 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice Habeas Relief Denied; Trial Court's Jury Charge Is Deemed Constitutionally Permissible Brown v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:43 am by Adam Wagner
Lords Phillips and Brown (with whom Lord Rodger agrees) dissent and hold that because the appellants would have been lawfully detained the Secretary of State is not liable to them in false imprisonment: [319]-[334], [343]-[360]. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
His judgment in British Chiropractic Association v Simon Singh [2009] EWHC 1101 (QB), received a great amount of publicity. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Lumba v Secretary of State for the Home Deparment – a case of driving government policy further underground? [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 9:29 am by Rosalind English
HELD: Appeal dismissed (Lords Hope, Rodger, Walker, and Brown dissenting). [read post]