Search for: "Small v. The State of New York et al" Results 101 - 120 of 307
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am by Schachtman
Jonathan Samet, et al., Institute of Medicine, Asbestos: Selected Health Effects (2006). [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:27 am by Cormac Early
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.] [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 10:23 am by Ron Coleman
Textbook Discounters in the Southern District of New York. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:27 am by Joe Consumer
Yet campaigns for medical malpractice reform persist in states with declining filings (e.g., New York Senate Bill 2011). [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:27 am by Joe Consumer
Yet campaigns for medical malpractice reform persist in states with declining filings (e.g., New York Senate Bill 2011). [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 1:19 pm by Jesse Dill
Charles Rose et al., out of New York state court, the employer faces claims similar to those under the FLSA but based on New York law. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Rounding out the state-specific discussions is a cogent offering in § 5 entitled, “Workplace Violence in New York Workers’ Compensation Claims,” by Ronald E. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:43 pm by Christa Culver
(forthcoming)Amicus brief of the Cato InstituteAmimcus brief of National Apartment Association et al. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm by Wolfgang Demino
  SHARON EUL et al., on behalf of themselves and a class, Plaintiffs,v.TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS et al., Defendants.No. 15 C 7755.United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
• Most consumers know little about food irradiation (American Meat Institute, 1993; Bruhn, 2001) • A survey conducted at FoodNet sites in 1998-1999, indicated that the primary reason consumers would not buy irradiated foods (meat, poultry) was due to insufficient information about the risks and benefits; the survey also showed 50% of those asked were willing to buy irradiated meat and poultry and among those, 25% were willing to pay a premium price (Frenzen et… [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:04 am
  Presumably, the Court will hold onto that case until it decides McDonald; the same is likely for the New York case, Maloney v. [read post]