Search for: "Smart v State"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,564
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2008, 10:16 pm
Exercising its discretion under United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 1:01 pm
With the relatively recent invention of cell phones and the sudden pervasiveness of smart phones in the United States, the Court was forced to grapple with the application of century old legal principles to the practical realties... [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 2:06 pm
See United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 2:19 pm
The Supreme Court was clear in Carpenter v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 9:25 am
The court cited Nava v. [read post]
18 May 2013, 6:30 am
A ruling last week by the Massachusetts Appeals Court in Citizens Bank v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 6:00 am
Do you have an opinion on which state is better for business, CA or TX? [read post]
22 May 2014, 1:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 1:46 am
The Court stated that the focus of the appeal is the crossing rules, but it is important to read them in context. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 1:08 pm
California, United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 1:57 pm
In Smart Options, LLC v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 7:44 am
Lawsuits over voice-activated assistants (and other smart home devices) are interesting. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:50 am
Riley v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 12:22 pm
You're smart. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 10:00 am
Recent decisions by Administrative Law Judges of the NYC Office of Administrative Trials and HearingsHuman Resources Administration v Smart, OATH Index No. 1325/16NYC Dept. of Transportation v Harris, OATH Index No. 1531/16 Matter of Smart: In the Smart case, OATH Administrative Law Judge Kevin F. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 9:26 am
In 2014, in Commonwealth v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Colleen V. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 8:49 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 5:51 pm
In a posting on the Official Google Blog, Drummond states: …Android’s success has yielded something else: a hostile, organized campaign against Android by Microsoft, Oracle, Apple and other companies, waged through bogus patents. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 2:00 pm
Washington should be retroactively applied to two state defendants, Troy Smart and Henry Douglas, whose sentences were final before June 24, 2004, when Blakely was decided. [read post]
