Search for: "Smart v. England" Results 41 - 60 of 100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2019, 5:43 am
The court found in favour of Maradona, awarding damages amounting to EUR 70,000.PatentsAnnsley Merelle Ward reported on the decision of the England and Wales Court of Appeal in Teva v Gilead. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 2:55 am by Etelka Bogardi (HK) and Stephanie Chan
The Court of First Instance also took into consideration the UK Jurisdiction Taskforce’s Legal Statement on Cryptoassets and Smart Contracts[2] published in November 2019 and the New Zealand case of Ruscoe v Cryptopia[3]. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 8:19 am by Kay Marbiah
The technology underlying cryptocurrencies has led to the development of other cryptoassets such as NFTs and is transforming real world processes through smart contracts. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 2:01 am
From a practical perspective, IPKat Eleonora Rosati answers the question by referring to the judgment of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales in Cartier, which confirmed that owners of IP rights other than copyright can seek injunctions against intermediaries to block access to website where counterfeits are available.* Swedish Supreme Court has ruled that sport broadcasts are not protected by copyrightReaders may remember that IPKat reported the C More case (see here and here) in 2015.… [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 8:42 am
In August 2008 subscription service Lawtel picked a curious little post-franchising case, ChipsAway International Ltd v Errol Kerr [2008] EWHC 1887 (Ch), a decision of the Chancery Division for England and Wales by Sir Andrew Park (see IPKat note here). [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 3:50 am
 The IPKat learns from his friend Brian Cordery (Bristows) that the Supreme Court has granted permission to appeal in Schlumberger v Electromagnetic Services (noted by the IPKat here). [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 9:07 am by Ron Coleman
Charbucks case (decision here, posted by Marty; the real name of the case is Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 4:18 am by Eric Segall
" Stone told him that he was "a New Englander, ... a Jew, and you are not a Democrat. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 1:16 am
 There was only going to be one winner in the proceedings mentioned here, and it wasn't going to be any of the defendants: by name, Yell Ltd v Louis Giboin and others [2011] EWPCC 009, 4 April 2011, a decision of Judge Birss QC in the Patents County Court (PCC), England and Wales. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 07239-19 Heneghan v coventrytelegraph.net, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved- IPSO mediation 05741-19 Grant and Pitts v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach- after investigation 01212-19 Ashley v The Sun, 1 Accuracy (2018), No breach- after investigation  Statements in Open Court and Apologies On 24 October 2019 there was a statement in open court [pdf] in the case of Morgan… [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 9:42 am
Either way, the December issue has now been published online (the print edition will be out soon -- but well over 90% of subscribers take the online version); contributors include regular Kat Birgit plus frequent guest contributors Valentina Torelli and Paul England. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
Last year, Davies publicly accused Kurd of plagiarising a gag that compares a smart fridge to a nagging wife. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:50 pm
 The grant of privilege was not discretionary (Three Rivers District Council and Others v The Governor and Company of the Bank of England [2004] UKHL 48), and confidentiality in itself was not sufficient to render a communication privileged. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 4:20 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
" asks @dorfonlaw pjblack.me/zjl1Ap #lwb242 the fascinating story behind the case: "Lawrence v Texas: How Laws Against Sodomy Became Unconstitutional" pjblack.me/yW6J9C yay! [read post]