Search for: "Smith and Nephew, Inc." Results 61 - 80 of 357
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2020, 8:59 pm by Patent Docs
Smith & Nephew, Inc. that Administrative Patent Judges (APJs) serving on the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) were principal officers and thus had been improperly appointed under the Appointments Clause, and accordingly vacated a PTAB determination in an inter partes review proceeding and remanded for consideration by a panel of properly appointed APJs (see "Federal Circuit Holds APJs Are Principal Officers"). [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 8:08 pm by Patent Docs
Smith & Nephew, Inc., a three-judge panel of the Federal Circuit held that the way the U.S. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 1:53 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Smith & Nephew, Inc., 941 F.3d 1320 (Fed. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 8:15 pm by Patent Docs
Smith & Nephew, Inc., that administrative patent judges ("APJs") were improperly appointed in violation of the Appointments Clause, to ex parte proceedings in In re Boloro Global Limited. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:53 am
Plaintiffs Smith & Nephew, Inc. and John Hayhurst (collectively "S&N") had appealed the district court's decision to grant Arthrex's motion for judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
7 May 2020, 12:53 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Smith & Nephew, Inc., 941 F.3d 1320(Fed. [read post]
31 May 2018, 11:50 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
., of Mahwah, New Jersey filed suit in the District Court of New Jersey alleging that Defendants, Zimmer, Inc. of Warsaw, Indiana, Centerpulse Orthopedics, Inc. of Austin, Texas, and Smith & Nephew, Inc. of Memphis, Tennessee infringed its rights in United States Patent No. 6,174,934 (“the ‘934 Patent”) for “Non-oxidizing Polymeric Medical Implant”, United States Patent No. 6,372,814 (“the ‘814 Patent”)… [read post]