Search for: "Smith v. Alabama Department of Corrections"
Results 1 - 20
of 55
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2024, 4:36 am
The Alabama ACLU said that the Alabama Department of Corrections is not subject to regulation or oversight. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 11:22 am
Alabama Department of Corrections officials struggled for nearly two hours to insert an IV for administering the lethal drug, a process that typically should have taken up to six minutes, or a maximum of 30 minutes in extreme cases. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, (11th Cir., Jan. 24, 2024), the U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in a 2-1 decision refused to stop the January 25 execution of death row inmate Kenneth Smith. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 4:00 am
In Smith v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 9:00 pm
In Price v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 12:12 pm
Smith, the Eleventh Circuit held that Kenneth Eugene Smith alleged enough facts to support a possible finding that the Alabama Department of Corrections (ADOC) would violate his constitutional rights. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 10:59 am
Virginia Department of Corrections, 2013 U.S. [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 7:00 am
California Department of Corrections, 2014 U.S. [read post]
9 May 2007, 5:18 am
Priscilla Smith(Priscilla Smith represented Dr. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 11:01 am
In Smith v. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 1:42 pm
Washington Department of Corrections, 2013 U.S. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
State departments of corrections also tend to be tunnel-visioned, focusing more on the political pressures of carrying out executions expeditiously and less on designing unproblematic methods of execution. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 8:13 am
In Smith v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm
Missouri Department of Corrections v. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 6:05 am
Smith Corp., Circuit Court of Illinois, Third Judicial Circuit (Dec. 22, 2004). [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:47 am
Briefly: Jess Bravin of the Wall Street Journal reports that the Department of Justice is “prepared to correct its possibly misleading statements” made to the Court during proceedings in Nken v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:09 am
(Very occasionally it can be an issue of enormous and urgent national consequence, such as Bush v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:59 pm
Smith, 786 F.2d 1011, 1012 (11th Cir. 1986)); see also Ritter v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 9:24 pm
The facts of Murphy v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 9:56 am
Smith, 647 F.3d 619 (6th Cir. 2011)), suffer from alcoholism during trial (People v. [read post]
