Search for: "Smith v. Associated Natural Gas Co." Results 21 - 40 of 80
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
  Because doing the job right would require research well beyond prescription medical products, we looked for research help, and enterprising (pun intended) Reed Smith associate Kevin Hara stepped up to handle the initial spadework. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
When Canadian Courts Cite the Major Philosophers: Who Cites Whom in Canadian Caselaw Queen’s University Legal Research Paper No. 2017-090; CLLR 42:2 Nancy McCormack is an Associate Professor and Law Librarian at Queen’s University. [read post]
31 May 2010, 11:57 am by law shucks
And when it’s former-associate v. firm, that’s all the more interesting. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
Etiology is usually not needed to determine the nature of the disease or the proper course of treatment. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm by Bexis
  Slip op. at 10-11. (2) Enterprise liability failed (it’s never actually been recognized by anybody anywhere since Judge Weinstein dreamed it up back in 1972) because the product was governmentally regulated (by the FDA) rather than left in the hands of an industry trade association. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm by Bexis
Appx. 689, 693 (10th Cir. 2011) (Phelan principle “ is especially true when a federal court is asked to make a policy laden choice for the State of Utah”); Northern Natural Gas Co. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 10:01 pm by Barry Barnett
One of the defendants, Stream Energy, buys and sells electricity and natural gas but produces neither. [read post]