Search for: "Smith v. Bartlett" Results 41 - 60 of 72
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2014, 2:46 pm
Supreme Court – constitutionality/remittitur of punitive damages in bifurcated action·                     Smith v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Bartlett, 678 F.3d 30 (1st Cir. 2012), rev’d, 133 S. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 4:00 pm by Aurora Barnes
Bartlett 17-1174 Issue: Whether probable cause defeats a First Amendment retaliatory-arrest claim under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:36 am by John Elwood
De Grandy and Bartlett v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm by INFORRM
It was Jeremy Hunt’s former special adviser Adam Smith and News Corporation lobbyist Frédéric Michel, however, who dominated the news coverage. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm by John Elwood
Smith, which holds that laws of general applicability that burden religious exercise are not subject to strict scrutiny. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 7:53 am by Amy Howe
” Two months after the oral argument in the Wisconsin case, the justices announced that they would also review the Maryland case, known in the Supreme Court as Benisek v. [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian covers the latest delays in the defamation trial between ex-soldier Ben Roberts-Smith and the Age, Canberra Times and Sydney Morning Herald over allegations that he committed war crimes while on tour in Afghanistan. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
Evidently, the intellectual property bar cares a great deal about whether, under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, an inventor’s sale of an invention to a third party who is obligated to keep the invention confidential qualifies as prior art for purposes of determining the patentability of the invention. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
The following post is exclusively the work of the Reed Smith side of the blog.Sometimes the smallest, least significant type of lawsuit can illustrate cracks in the edifice of the largest, most consequential litigation. [read post]