Search for: "Smith v. Delaware State Housing Authority." Results 1 - 20 of 51
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2009, 4:32 pm
The five-member Delaware Supreme Court unanimously ruled on February 3 in Smith v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 5:41 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
Some states, like Delaware, retained their separate chancery courts for specific types of actions. [read post]
30 May 2018, 3:13 pm by Eugene Volokh
From yesterday's Delaware Supreme Court decision in Everett v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 5:00 am by Jennifer S. Taub
Justice Ginsburg pushed Perry further stating that “in fact, it was JCM’s lawyers . . . they were in-house lawyers for JCM. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
Notable state judicial review under state constitutions in fact predated the Philadelphia Convention and Marbury v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
Strine notes that Unocal’s board met for eight or nine hours to consider Pickens’ offer — a response to Smith v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 12:36 am
Source: New York State Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), January 15, 2007 For your information we are posting the entire New York Legislature 2007 Chapter Law List as retrieved from the New York Legislative Retrieval System on January 15, 2008. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
Only three states still have separate courts of equity—Delaware, Mississippi, and Tennessee—though a handful of other states do draw some jurisdictional distinction between law and equity cases.[12] But in all fifty states “equity” remains part of the everyday vocabulary of courts and lawyers. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am by Kyle Persaud
New York City Housing Authority, 827 F.Supp. 179, 182. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am by Kyle Persaud
New York City Housing Authority, 827 F.Supp. 179, 182. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am by Jed Handelsman Shugerman
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Seila Law v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Almeida-Perez, No. 07-2602, 07-2635 In a prosecution of two brothers for being illegal aliens in possession of firearms that had been transported in interstate commerce, denial of defendants' motion to suppress evidence is affirmed over claims that the district court erred in: 1) finding that police reasonably relied on the real or apparent authority of defendants' cousin to consent to police entry of their house; 2) finding that other occupants of their house… [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:45 pm
Hamilton, No. 06-2933 Conviction for conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute marijuana is remanded for further proceedings where defendant's motion to suppress evidence seized from a house, in which he claimed a privacy interest, could not properly be denied on grounds of lack of standing without a hearing. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Michael Bender and Anjali Huynh (New York Times) | Published: 11/29/2023 Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]