Search for: "Smith v. Dept. of Corrections"
Results 1 - 20
of 78
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2008, 12:02 pm
Indiana Dept. of Correction, a 4-page, 5-0 opinion, Justice Boehm writes:For the reasons given in Smith v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm
Smith v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 4:10 am
Failure to file prehearing statements required by the reviewing agency’s rules held to constitute a “waiver of defenses”Matter of Smith v Albany County Sheriff's Dept., 2011 NY Slip Op 01559, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentRaymond C. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 8:45 pm
For example, in February 2008, we noted that the Court in People v Smith (2008 NY Slip Op 00904 [4th Dept 2008)held that [W]e agree with defendant that the court erred in calculating the expiration date of the order of protection without taking into account the jail time credit to which she is entitled (see People v Clinkscales, 35 AD3d 1266, 1267; People v Hare, 27 AD3d 1171, 1172, lv denied 6 NY3d 892, 894, 898). [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 9:34 am
Category: Employment Opinions;Recent Decisions Body: SC18187 - AFSCME, Council 4, Local 1565 v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 12:39 pm
While it was not dispositive of the case, the Board in Smith v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 4:47 pm
Kolupa (in a correctional facility) to explain this result? [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
"Under CPLR 7511 (b) an arbitration award must be vacated if, as relevant here, a party's rights were impaired by an arbitrator who 'exceeded [their] power' " (Matter of Kowaleski [New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs.], 16 NY3d 85, 90 [2010], quoting CPLR 7511 [b] [1] [iii]). [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
"Under CPLR 7511 (b) an arbitration award must be vacated if, as relevant here, a party's rights were impaired by an arbitrator who 'exceeded [their] power' " (Matter of Kowaleski [New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs.], 16 NY3d 85, 90 [2010], quoting CPLR 7511 [b] [1] [iii]). [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm
Colbert In Smith International v. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 6:00 am
, LP v Service Empls. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 6:00 am
, LP v Service Empls. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 4:06 am
” (Rosenman Colin Freund Lewis & Cohen v Edelman, 160 AD2d 626, 626 [1st Dept 1990].) [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 5:00 am
See Smith v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:08 pm
Smith v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 3:00 am
Hollins (citing Smith v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 5:40 pm
For publication opinions today (4): Bobby Robinson a/k/a Steven Smith v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 12:33 pm
Co. (1st Dept., decided 12/15/2009) Since February 2008, when the New York Court of Appeals issued its groundbreaking, 5-2 decisions in Bi-Economy Mkt., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 1:37 pm
To continue with the cheery news, the First Dept., in an April 7, 2009 decision in a construction accident case, Kleinberg v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
Smith, #13-15476, 2016 U.S. [read post]
