Search for: "Smith v. Employment Division"
Results 81 - 100
of 742
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2015, 5:10 am
” Employment Division v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 4:00 am
A public employer may impose restraints on First Amendment activities of its employees that are job-related that would be unconstitutional if applied to the public at largeSanter v Board of Educ. of E. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 7:55 am
Smith v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Disqualifying an applicant for examination or for appoint to, or continued employment in, a position in the classified serviceSokol v New York City Civ. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Disqualifying an applicant for examination or for appoint to, or continued employment in, a position in the classified serviceSokol v New York City Civ. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 9:37 am
EFFECT: This law is a legislative overturning of a California Court of Appeal decision (Rope v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
This issue may also arise in connection with an employee's former employer supplying information to a prospective employer of the individual in response to a request for "references" (see Buxton v Plant City, 57 LW 2649). [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:25 am
On Wednesday, Mr Justice Norris (Chancery Division, England and Wales) gave his ruling in Burrows v Smith, Crush Digital Media Ltd [2010] EWHC 22 (Ch), an interesting little copyright/breach of confidence dispute. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 11:12 am
Accordingly, the Appellate Division concluded that neither educator could avail herself of the hearing procedures set out in Education Law §3020-a.Further, while a counseling letter is “active” in a personnel file, the district may subsequently initiate disciplinary action based on the same event and the memorandum itself could be introduced as evidence in the course of the disciplinary proceeding.On this point, as the Court of Appeal ruled in Patterson v… [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 4:10 am
Smith, (1990) (majority opinion)Lee v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 12:09 pm
Smith, 726 P.2d 423, 426 (Utah 1986). [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 7:09 pm
Smith, 726 P.2d 423, 426 (Utah 1986). [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
Hutchison, Revisiting Employment Division v. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 11:36 am
In the case of Smith v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 10:29 am
City of Philadelphia, which argues that the Court was right in Employment Division v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 9:23 am
The issue is whether the Supreme Court's landmark Free Exercise Clause decision in Employment Division v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 8:36 am
Chief Justice Roberts wrote the opinion of the court which was joined by five other justices, avoiding the question of whether to overrule Employment Division v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 9:37 am
EFFECT: This law is a legislative overturning of a California Court of Appeal decision (Rope v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 12:00 am
”Employment Division v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 8:00 am
District Court for the Western District of Arkansas, Fort Smith Division, seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief.In mid-February, the agency announced a settlement where in addition to a cash payment of $520,000, the company agreed to modify its employment related policies and practices, and will no longer terminate an individual based solely on their test-related performance.In a written statement, Faye Williams, regional attorney for the EEOC’s Memphis… [read post]
