Search for: "Smith v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 25
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2010, 1:50 am
" An insider's view of the Ticketmaster-Live Nation merger "The proposed merger between Ticketmaster Entertainment Inc. and Live Nation Inc., the world's largest concert promoter, won Justice Department approval on Jan. 25, following a year of negotiations and antitrust scrutiny. [read post]
27 May 2023, 12:23 pm
I'll live-tweet about the case management conference on Tuesday. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:22 pm
Smith v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 8:12 am
MGFB Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:56 am
Never too late 39 [week ending Sunday 29 March] – Merpel writes to the EPO AC | CJEU and hyperlinks | New gTLD regime | AG on TM reputation and genuine use in Case C‑125/14 Iron & Smith Kft v Unilever NV | AMBA speaks | Digital exhaustion | CJEU on linking to live shows in Case C-279/13 C More Entertainment| EPO Enlarged Board on amendments’ clarity in G 3/14 | EPO on patentability in… [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:18 am
Never too late 39 [week ending Sunday 29 March] – Merpel writes to the EPO AC | CJEU and hyperlinks | New gTLD regime | AG on TM reputation and genuine use in Case C‑125/14 Iron & Smith Kft v Unilever NV | AMBA speaks | Digital exhaustion | CJEU on linking to live shows in Case C-279/13 C More Entertainment| EPO Enlarged Board on amendments’ clarity in G 3/14 | EPO on patentability in… [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
Two years later, in Starz Entertainment v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:50 pm
Never too late 39 [week ending Sunday 29 March] – Merpel writes to the EPO AC | CJEU and hyperlinks | New gTLD regime | AG on TM reputation and genuine use in Case C‑125/14 Iron & Smith Kft v Unilever NV | AMBA speaks | Digital exhaustion | CJEU on linking to live shows in Case C-279/13 C More Entertainment| EPO Enlarged Board on amendments’ clarity in G 3/14 | EPO on patentability in… [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
Now, Darren sinks his paws on the appeal decision in Hospira (UK) Ltd v Genentech, Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 57 (6 February 2015). [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 7:31 am
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 39 [week ending Sunday 29 March] – Merpel writes to the EPO AC | CJEU and hyperlinks | New gTLD regime | AG on TM reputation and genuine use in Case C‑125/14 Iron & Smith Kft v Unilever NV | AMBA speaks | Digital exhaustion | CJEU on linking to live shows in Case C-279/13 C More Entertainment| EPO Enlarged Board on amendments’ clarity… [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm
The High Court has ruled a class-action lawsuit against TikTok concerning children’s privacy violations can proceed, SMO v TikTok Inc. and Others [2022] EWHC 489 (QB). [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:00 am
Tom Cruise may have said it most memorably, but we all live it every day. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Oleg Teterin seeks ‘tens of thousands of dollars’ for rights to use ;-) emoticon, a registered Russian trade mark (Techdirt) (RelatIP) (Ars Technica) (The IP Factor) (Out-Law) (Class 46) New UK copyright consultation: consultation issues include access to works, incentivising investment and creativity, recognising… [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 5:54 am
National tour. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Lynn, MA; Peter Smith, President) Bain Cor, Inc. [read post]
8 May 2010, 8:53 am
In The Mortgage Specialists, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
Being open to competition serves Canada’s national interest. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
" See Smith v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:16 am
Brian and Malek are members of the First Amendment, Media & Entertainment Law Practicum at the Cleveland-Marshall College of Law, and Jack is a summer law clerk at the Chandra Law Firm.) [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
The argument in many of the sources (though not all) goes something like this: The content industry, the entertainment industry, the copyright industries — and by extension the artists, authors, and creators who make their living producing expressive works — fail to see the opportunities presented by new technologies. [read post]
