Search for: "Smith v. Mueller" Results 1 - 20 of 58
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2024, 2:25 pm by Steven Calabresi
 Gene Schaerr filed the amicus brief, which grows out of a law review article that Gary Lawson and I published: Why Robert Mueller's Appointment as Special Counsel was Unlawful, 95 Notre Dame. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:59 am by Steven Calabresi
Private citizen Jack Smith lacks standing to petition the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari before judgement in United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Special prosecutors like Robert Mueller and Jack Smith are now appointed pursuant to Justice Department guidelines and political pressure. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 8:01 pm by Josh Blackman
The post Comparing the Orders Appointing Special Counsel Mueller and Special Counsel Smith appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
” When it comes to the Mar-a-Lago investigation, the order establishes that Smith will oversee “the ongoing investigation referenced and described in the United States' Response to Motion for Judicial Oversight and Additional Relief, Donald J Trump v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Gaetz was apparently unaware they were being recorded by documentary filmmakers following Stone, whom special counsel Robert Mueller had charged with obstruction of a congressional investigation. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 7:02 am by Elizabeth McAuliffe (Bristows)
” (paragraph 12) In deciding which description of the skilled person he preferred, Morgan J provided a helpful summary of the established features of the skilled person at paragraphs 13 and 16 – 18 of the Judgment: The skilled person is the person to whom the claims in a patent are addressed and that would be a person with a practical interest in the subject matter of the claims in the patent and with practical knowledge and experience of the kind of work in which the invention was… [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am by Jed Handelsman Shugerman
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Seila Law v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 3:49 am by Rachel Mumby (Bristows)
  This careful use of language is definitely on display in the recent judgment of the Court of Appeal in Neurim v Mylan[1] where the Court of Appeal has dismissed Neurim’s appeal against the rejection of its application for a preliminary injunction, but at the same time politely picked apart significant sections of the reasoning of Marcus Smith J at first instance. [read post]