Search for: "Smith v. Ohio" Results 161 - 180 of 995
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2019, 4:57 am by MBettman
” Justice DeWine, dissent On May 15, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 8:30 am by Scott Bomboy
 A select Senate committee issued a subpoena for Daugherty to testify and to also surrender records from an Ohio bank. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 7:10 am by Patricia Salkin
  Smith v Warren County Rural Zoning Board of Appeals, 2019 WL 1895857 (OH App. 4/29/2019)   [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 11:19 am by Lyle Denniston
Some years ago, a constitutional law essay by an Ohio professor began this way: “At least within the church-state community, one is hard-pressed to find a Supreme Court ruling held in lower esteem than Employment Division v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973) (upholding criminalization of obscenity); Smith v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973) (upholding criminalization of obscenity); Smith v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 9:35 am by Schachtman
Back in 2001, in the aftermath of the silicone gel breast implant litigation, I participated in a Federal Judicial Center (FJC) television production of “Science in the Courtroom, program 6” (2001). [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Carl Coleman, Seton Hall University School of Law, Ethical Issues in Managing Vector-Borne Diseases Stacie Kershner, Georgia State University College of Law, Public Health Law and the E-Scooter Epidemic Noah Smith-Drelich, Columbia Law School, Food Tax Substitution Effects B. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am by Katherine Kelley
Content warning: This post contains content that may be upsetting for some readers. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 4:00 pm by eDiscovery Import
Key Insight: Interference or concealment are not actionable under the tort Nature of Case: Wrongful termination (sex discrimination), intentional interference/destruction of evidence tort   [read post]