Search for: "Smith v. Public Service Commission" Results 1 - 20 of 585
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2016, 8:00 am by Jeff Gittins
Public Service Commission and Hi-Country Estates Homeowners Association. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 11:13 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Carroll v Kynaston [2010] EWCA Civ 1404 (13 December 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Smith v ADVFN Plc & Ors [2010] EWHC 3255 (QB) (13 December 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Public Interest Lawyers v Legal Services Commission [2010] EWHC 3277 (Admin) (13 December 2010) High Court (Patents Court) Pfizer Health AB & Anor v Schwarz Pharma AG & Ors [2010] EWHC… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
If employed, the individual is either working in the private sector or the public sector.[3]  Excluding the federal government and interstate compact commissions and authorities, if serving in the public sector in New York State the individual is either in the State’s military service[4] or its civil service. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
If employed, the individual is either working in the private sector or the public sector.[3]  Excluding the federal government and interstate compact commissions and authorities, if serving in the public sector in New York State the individual is either in the State’s military service[4] or its civil service. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Colorado Civil Rights Commission: such laws compel governmental orthodoxy. [read post]
27 May 2015, 6:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Submitting, demanding and withdrawing a resignation from public employment 2015 NY Slip Op 04408, Appellate Division, First DepartmentThe rules of the New York State Civil Service Commission provide that "every resignation shall be in writing" [4 NYCRR 5.3(a)]. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 12:20 am by INFORRM
The decision of Binchy J in Muwema v Facebook Ireland Ltd [2016] IEHC 519 (23 August 2016) demonstrates that, on the question of the liability of internet intermediaries for defamatory posts on their platforms, an important part of the answer is provided by application of the defence of innocent publication provided in section 27 of the Defamation Act 2009 (also here). [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am by Dianne Saxe
Kirk Baert has kindly permitted us to post his Application to the Supreme Court of Canada for leave to appeal the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Smith v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
EU copyright reform The last European Commission closed its Public Consultation on EU copyright rules on 5 February 2014. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
First, the Law Commission did not discuss how the offence might apply to public online communications. [read post]