Search for: "Smith v. Strike Force, Department of Justice" Results 1 - 20 of 94
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
It’s not that the Court had departed from its usual approach in Smith. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 3:00 pm by Jane Chong
The idea is to bat away the Department of Justice’s apparent bid to have the appeal knocked out on jurisdictional grounds. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 4:44 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Three of the Chicago cases charging four defendants are part of a nationwide takedown by Medicare Fraud Strike Force operations, announced today by the Departments of Justice and Health and Human Services, that led to charges against 91 defendants for their alleged participation in schemes to collectively submit more than $295 million in fraudulent claims to the Medicare program. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 4:44 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Three of the Chicago cases charging four defendants are part of a nationwide takedown by Medicare Fraud Strike Force operations, announced today by the Departments of Justice and Health and Human Services, that led to charges against 91 defendants for their alleged participation in schemes to collectively submit more than $295 million in fraudulent claims to the Medicare program. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:26 am by Emily Coward
Smith, The Historical and Constitutional Contexts of Jury Reform, 25 Hofstra L. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Perhaps distinct among university departments, law schools have a close and delicate relation with political power. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am by Just Security
Department of State’s Office of Global Criminal Justice: It will take time to fully digest this morning’s order. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 11:12 am by Garrett Hinck
Sabrina McCubbin summarized pre-trial motions in Smith v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:15 am by admin
Then, in 1980, the Court upheld an Air Force rule in Brown v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 5:01 am by Jacob Schulz
But the Justice Department and the Second Circuit’s handling of the case has some real relevance to the current moment. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 8:00 am
Kennedy Issue: Whether states subject to Voting Rights Act pre-clearance requirements must receive Justice Department approval before implementing decisions of its highest court striking down previously pre-cleared state laws. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm by John Elwood
United States, 18-7096 Issues: (1) Whether the “touches or strikes” language in the Florida battery statutes is divisible under Descamps v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 10:56 am by Jeff Gamso
Smith: Does the Department of Justice recognize that federal courts have the authority in appropriate circumstances to strike federal statutes because of one or more constitutional infirmities? [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 8:10 am by Priscilla Smith
Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice, has sounded alarm bells among advocates for reproductive rights. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
Islam v Secretary of State for the Home Department, R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Another, ex parte Shah (1999) Nora Honkala72. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:47 am by Kiran Bhat
Jerry Seper of the Washington Times reports on testimony by a Justice Department in the Senate on the effects of the Court’s decision on FOIA procedures in Milner v. [read post]