Search for: "Smith v. Universal Insurance Company" Results 61 - 80 of 154
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2015, 9:29 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Or, as is common in accident cases, the defendant had a policy of insurance in effect at the time of the accident, and the insurance company hires a lawyer to argue that the defendant was not at fault and to otherwise defend against the claim. [read post]
14 May 2015, 11:14 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Arnold of Arnold & Smith, PLLC answers the question “Do I have to sign a release allowing the insurance company to get my medical records? [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:45 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
The United States Supreme Court actually rejected the notion that the Federal Government can require an individual to purchase health insurance in a now-famous 2012 decision authored by Chief Justice John Roberts in National Federation of Independent Business et al. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:33 am by Myron Orfield
Duke Power Company, per that racial radical Warren Burger, found a disparate-impact cause of action under Title VII and, more recently in Smith v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 4:37 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
G & K and Schiavone were the named insureds under an insurance policy issued by Auto-Owners Insurance Company, and they were also “additional insureds” under an Auto-Owners policy issued to In Time. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 12:34 am by Editors
Time to check your crystal ball to see what it portends for the legal industry in 2015 – or you can just head over to the Business of Law Blog to see what others think. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
  Here on the Reed Smith side of the blog, three of our core contributors are located in Pennsylvania and California. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
We are unwilling to make brand manufacturers the de facto insurers for competing generic manufacturers. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:33 am by Marty Lederman
  That is simply not how the Court resolved free exercise claims in the generation preceding Smith. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 10:18 am by John Eastman
Smith, which held that religious liberty loses to mandates imposed by generally applicable laws. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 5:30 am by Renee Kolar
Trinity Universal of Kan., 939 P.2d 869, 872 (Kan. 1997); Smith v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Those regulations require large- and medium-sized companies to offer their employees health insurance that covers contraception, or else face stiff financial penalties. [read post]
8 Mar 2014, 3:01 pm by Law Lady
The University of Notre Dame self‐insures employees’ medical expenses; Meritain administers the employee health plan. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am by Marty Lederman
  As Joey Fishkin explained here, the whole point of the ACA is to create a new universal entitlement—affordable health insurance, including for the specified preventive services. [read post]