Search for: "Smithkline Beecham Pharmaceutical Co." Results 21 - 40 of 87
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2016, 10:43 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
SmithKline Beecham Corp., which would have excluded pharmaceutical sales representatives, and favored a “functional,” “flexible,” and “realistic” rather than “technical” and “formalistic” approach to interpreting the FLSA exemption. [read post]
13 May 2012, 10:17 pm by Leland E. Beck
SmithKline Beecham deference-to-agency-amicus-briefs fray argued and pending decision before the Supreme Court and resolving an interdistrict conflict. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 7:09 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp., 2007 WL 2726259 (S.D. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 1:23 pm by Jason Rantanen
Cir. 2006) (en banc in part) SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 7:30 am by Conor McEvily
SmithKline Beecham Corp. in which the Court will consider whether the Fair Labor Standards Act’s “outside sales exemption” applies to pharmaceutical sales representatives. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 7:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Kenya: Manufacturers, public heath interests clash over anti-counterfeit law; AIDS patients to bring Constitutional challenge (Intellectual Property Watch) (Afro-IP) (Intellectual Property Watch) Humira (Adalimumab) – US: Largest patent verdict in history – Abbott to pay $1.67 billion to Centocor because Humira found to… [read post]