Search for: "Snowden v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 473
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2020, 12:32 pm
In July of 2011, he filed a qui tam lawsuit under the False Claims Act, Blake Percival v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 12:32 pm
In July of 2011, he filed a qui tam lawsuit under the False Claims Act, Blake Percival v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:49 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decided United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:49 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:26 am
Surveillance On 3 September 2020 the BBC had a piece “NSA surveillance exposed by Snowden ruled unlawful”. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 4:01 am
See, for example, United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 4:54 pm
[An overlooked part of United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 1:08 pm
Fifth Circuit: It is, notwithstanding Justice Alito's suggestion in Reed v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 4:26 pm
In the aftermath of the Schrems II ruling, Věra Jourova, the Vice President of the European Commission for Value and Transparency has stated in an official press conference that the European Commission will work with their American counterparts to discuss a way forward. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 8:31 am
From Edward Snowden to Luxembourg The case, Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:59 pm
EFF recently filed an amicus brief in Doc Society v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 12:13 pm
The Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 2:32 pm
Related Cases: Twitter v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 4:16 pm
Co.) and Houston, Texas (Barbara Lane Snowden v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 3:49 am
District Court for the District of Columbia, Hoffa v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 3:44 pm
Hunt v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 4:21 pm
Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 5:08 am
The views expressed by Advocate General (AG) Henrik Saugmandsgaard Øe of Denmark in the case of Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm
Two witnesses—a former State Department official and Glenn Simpson of Fusion GPS—declined to be interviewed, but there is no suggestion in the report, or in the inspector general’s testimony, that this altered the outcome of the investigation. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm
He gave Article 23 DPD a very narrow reading, contrary to CJEU decisions such as Case C–168/00 Leitner v TUI Deutschland GmbH [2002] ECR I–1631 (ECLI:EU:C:2002:163; ECJ, 12 March 2002), which held that compensation for “damage” must include both material and non-material damage, that is, both actual damage and distress (see also Case C-63/09 Walz v Clickair SA [2010] ECR I 4239 (ECLI:EU:C:2010:251; CJEU, 6 May 2010); Case… [read post]
