Search for: "Snyder v. U.s"
Results 41 - 60
of 546
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2022, 9:30 pm
Ford on Key v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
In a dispute over the meaning of a procedural rule, justices seem settled: “Mistake” means “mistake”
20 Apr 2022, 6:51 am
ShareKemp v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 5:01 am
{In Snyder, the U.S. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 9:22 am
Singh v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
Oklahoma, following a cigarette tax increase from $1.03 to $2.03 in the Summer of 2018, has seen a significant increase in smuggling into the state, moving it from a ranking of 30th to 17th highest inflow of cigarettes in the U.S. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 11:22 am
Kentucky the U.S. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 3:42 pm
The U.S. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 10:30 am
By James V. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 9:15 am
The U.S. government sought certiorari to challenge the remand, and after its decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 5:27 am
She is Senior Counselor to the Director at the U.S. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 11:37 am
As in Snyder v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 4:05 pm
Toibb v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 5:45 pm
., Assoc. of Civilian Technicians v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 7:42 am
§ 1071, while ambiguous, favored the interpretation that a party dissatisfied with an initial TTAB decision, or any subsequent TTAB decision, retains the right to choose whether to appeal the decision to the Federal Circuit or to a district court (Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 7:42 am
§ 1071, while ambiguous, favored the interpretation that a party dissatisfied with an initial TTAB decision, or any subsequent TTAB decision, retains the right to choose whether to appeal the decision to the Federal Circuit or to a district court (Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. v. [read post]
27 May 2021, 8:11 am
The Supreme Court in Brnovich v. [read post]
8 May 2021, 1:54 pm
Ohio, the Texas v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 3:00 pm
But of course that logic can't hold, either; as Randy's and my article chronicles, in just the last year we've seen similar demands to expurgate the word "fag" (which has a starring role in the most important recent Supreme Court case on offensive speech, Snyder v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:13 pm
Mississippi, 481 U.S. 648 (1987) (excusing a qualified juror is reversible error); accord State v. [read post]
