Search for: "Solar v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 275
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
  JUNE The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned Roe v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 1:25 pm by William Appleton
United States of America, which vacated a U.S. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Claire Hill
Supreme Court ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:01 pm
And that value was as important for the Chinese, Russians, and second tier group of American-wary states, as it now appears to be to the United States. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Linden
Despite all that, thanks to a sea change in the economy, the Court’s decision may have only a minor impact on efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 4:05 am by Tom Merrill
United States, 459 U.S. 131 (1982), the Supreme Court held that when an agency issues sequential decisions, reversal by a court of a later decision does not automatically reinstate an earlier one. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 12:44 am by Michael Ehline
These motorbikes come with a V-twin engine offering unparalleled torque power and a low seat height perfect. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 12:21 pm by Michael Ehline
Uber hopes to deploy flying cars as soon as 2023 in major cities in the United States. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Canadian Solar Inc., 2019 ONCA 992, 444 D.L.R. (4th) 131, at para. 18. [read post]
15 May 2022, 9:11 pm by The Regulatory Review Staff
December 8, 2021 | The Australian Model for Rooftop Solar Energy | Australian regulators demonstrate the benefits and drawbacks of locally driven policy. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 10:53 am by Kevin LaCroix
”  It called the use of the “generic” standard an “error” which it studiously traced back to the 2011 trial court opinion in United Westlabs, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 1:37 pm by Kristyn Melvin and Matt Bonovich
UFLPA effectively creates a rebuttable presumption that all goods manufactured wholly or in part in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region are the product of forced labor, and are therefore banned from importation into the United States.[12] The rebuttable presumption will apply unless an importer is able to demonstrate that it: Fully compiled with new importer guidance and any regulations issued to implement that guidance; Completely and substantively responded to all inquires for… [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Manchin’s family business stood to benefit financially when it was reclassified as something akin to solar, wind, and hydropower. [read post]