Search for: "Solomon v. Solomon"
Results 81 - 100
of 806
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2022, 6:43 am
Indeed, Rodriguez had the following exchange with Evan Solomon yesterday: Solomon: Can you justify why links are compensatory? [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 5:19 am
In Menkes v Solomon & Cramer LLP 2022 NY Slip Op 01740 Decided on March 15, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department resolved an attorney v. attorney legal malpractice case against Plaintiff. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 2:00 am
.; Shunta V. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 4:38 am
It is something of an Opinion of Solomon: recommending that the challenge be rejected, but only on the basis that the Directive is implemented in a way that minimises false positives. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 3:44 am
Lapsley v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 8:04 am
Solomon, No. 2053, Sept. [read post]
24 Dec 2021, 6:26 am
Peregrine, McDermott, Will & Emery LLP, on Monday, December 20, 2021 Tags: Accounting, Accounting standards, Audits, Boards of Directors, Corporate fraud, External auditors, Financial regulation, Internal auditors, PCAOB, Sarbanes–Oxley Act, Securities regulation Corporate Implications from COP26 Posted by Lee Anne Hagel and Kilian Moote (Georgeson) and Harry Etra (HXE Partners LLC), on Monday, December 20, 2021 … [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 6:40 am
The post VERNON CHARLES DONNELLY v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 2:56 pm
Tesón, Eminent Scholar Emeritus, Florida State University Signatories as of December 12, 2021 (additional signatures will be added as they arrive): Jesse Fried, Dane Professor of Law, Harvard Law School Steven Davidoff Solomon, Alexander F. and May T. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
"Judicial review of the discharge of a probationary employee is limited to whether the determination was made in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Petkewicz v Allers, 137 AD3d 1045, 1046 [2016] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Johnson v City of New York, 34 AD3d 484, 485 [2006]). [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
"Judicial review of the discharge of a probationary employee is limited to whether the determination was made in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Petkewicz v Allers, 137 AD3d 1045, 1046 [2016] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Johnson v City of New York, 34 AD3d 484, 485 [2006]). [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 12:48 pm
That is, one is looking at the Arizona rule independently of the question of how it fits with other states' rules.Bibb balancing - In Bibb v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:23 pm
As predicted, the first Jewish pitcher v. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 12:18 pm
And now Schadenfreude… Ashford Borough Council v Wilson (2021) EWHC 2542 (QB) Fergus Wilson, (for yes, it is he), has quite a track record of legal proceedings related to him behaving badly. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
" Lunney v. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 9:40 am
See R.A.V. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
Consider the 2021 decision of the First Department in Matter of Solomon M. v. [read post]
