Search for: "Special Response Corporation"
Results 41 - 60
of 7,671
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2015, 11:55 am
Formerly known as the flexible purpose corporation, the social purpose corporation requires directors to consider socially responsible purposes, in addition to shareholder interests, when making business decisions. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 6:02 am
A call for papers has been issued for a workshop on "Bringing the 'human problem' back into transnational law: The example of corporate (ir)responsibility," which will take place March 19-20, 2020, at King’s College London. [read post]
4 May 2009, 11:57 am
This is basically a special-interest approach to corporate governance, where the special interests of one group (the shareholders) is simply joined by the special interests of various other stakeholder. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm
And freedom is special and rare. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 11:42 am
The corporate governance structure specifies the distribution of rights and responsibilities among different participants in the corporation, such as, the board, managers, shareholders and other stakeholders, and spells out the rules and procedures for making decisions on corporate affairs. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 6:23 am
Lipton for the International Business Council of the World Economic Forum: The New Paradigm: A Roadmap for an Implicit Corporate Governance Partnership Between Corporations and Investors to Achieve Sustainable Long-Term Investment and Growth, as well as The Compact for Responsive and Responsible Leadership: A Roadmap for Sustainable Long-Term Growth and Opportunity. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 12:57 am
Here's the abstract: This article tells the story of a new business form—the special purpose acquisition corporation (SPAC). [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 8:00 pm
In his 2006 report, the Special Representative surveyed allegations of the worst cases of corporate-related human rights harm. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 9:26 pm
Ruggie, the Secretary-General’s Special Representative on Human Rights. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 12:11 pm
These questions were the topic of a special episode of LawNext, recorded live during Legalweek 2020 in New York City with a panel of four corporate counsel and executives who are leaders in law department innovation. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 4:34 am
For more on COVID-19, see our special coverage. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 6:10 am
“Companies recognize that they have a special responsibility in the world, social and environmental responsibility,” Schwab told me in an interview. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 5:38 pm
Corporate special interests can’t come out and say they want to avoid legal responsibility, so they’ve created a “lawsuit crisis” to scare legislators into making legal reforms that benefit their bottom lines. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 3:30 pm
The actions of myself and my firm are emblematic of the desire to promote corporate social responsibility. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 6:24 am
Posted by Martin Lipton, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Tuesday, March 15, 2016 Editor's Note: Martin Lipton is a founding partner of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, specializing in mergers and acquisitions and matters affecting corporate policy and strategy. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 6:01 am
Posted by Martin Lipton, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Wednesday, March 9, 2016 Editor's Note: Martin Lipton is a founding partner of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, specializing in mergers and acquisitions and matters affecting corporate policy and strategy. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 10:41 am
He specializes in corporate law and governance, cross-border investments and financial sector regulation. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 4:55 pm
” Written in response to the Citizens United decision, the paper makes the case for requiring shareholder approval of corporate political expenditures: Under existing corporate-law rules, corporate political speech decisions are subject to the same rules as ordinary business decisions. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 2:50 pm
A Reuters story notes that corporations are floating proposals making it easier for shareholders to call special meetings in response to similar shareholder-activist proposals: in an interesting political trick, the board proposals create a 25% threshold of shares rather than the 10% being proposed by activists, thus stealing thunder from activists without making it too easy to call a meeting. [read post]
22 May 2018, 2:00 am
The post Company Culture: Who Is Responsible for It? [read post]
