Search for: "Spitzer v. Spitzer"
Results 141 - 160
of 258
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2007, 1:16 am
Spitzer Subscription Required
U.S. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 4:16 am
To establish that they were intended third-party beneficiaries, plaintiffs must establish “(1) the existence of a valid and binding contract between other parties, (2) that the contract was intended for his/her benefit and (3) that the benefit to him/her is sufficiently immediate, rather than incidental, to indicate the assumption by the contracting parties of a duty to compensate him if the benefit is lost” (State of California Public Employees’ Retirement… [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 3:25 am
“The causation element requires a showing that the injured party would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have incurred any damages, but for the lawyer’s negligence” (Aqua-Trol Corp. v Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., 197 AD3d at 545 [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 1:20 am
Kramarsky, a member of Dewey Pegno & Kramarsky, writes that the recent decision in Barclays Capital Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 10:54 am
State v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 10:38 am
Here’s the part that caught our attention: Edward V. [read post]
4 May 2010, 10:38 am
Here’s the part that caught our attention: Edward V. [read post]
Law - "Supreme Court to Hear Arguments Next Week in States' Challenge to 'Preemption' of Regulation"
25 Nov 2006, 9:20 am
The case, Watters v. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 2:36 pm
However, in Mental Hygiene Legal Serv. v Spitzer (2007), the court enjoined the operation of this provision of the statute because it held that the continued detention of a respondent in every case following a probable cause determination but prior to a trial was "inherently coercive" and a violation of constitutional due process. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm
Spitzer. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 3:09 am
Spitzer, 568 F.3d 355, 368 (2d Cir. 2009)es “a Dow Chem. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 12:29 am
Spitzer v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 1:40 am
Spitzer v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 5:14 am
— from Phil Miles’s Lawffice Space EEOC talks employer wellness programs; provides an ADA Q&A — from Eric Meyer’s The Employer Handbook Blog A sanctions award in EEOC v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 10:30 am
(UK) Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 7:17 pm
Justice Thomas recused himself in Watters v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 8:01 pm
A copy of the full order and analysis in the Spencer v Hartford case. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 10:41 pm
I'd be spinning the horrors of federal preemption like Eliot Spitzer. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 2:36 pm
Shea v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 1:47 pm
" Ness In United States v. [read post]
