Search for: "Spooner v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 41
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2023, 7:30 am
Their images should be treated with the same scorn as those depicting Chief Justice Roger Taney, the author of the execrable decision in Dred Scott v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:30 am
Pennsylvania or Dred Scott, it would also have been helpful to include some relevant cases from northern states, such as licensing Roberts v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
For example, I’ve long taught the fascinating case of Elkison v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 7:08 am
In Abrams v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:28 am
These included Chandler v Thompson ((1811) 3 Camp 80, 170 ER 1312 [pdf]), Tapling v Jones (1865) 20 CBNS 166, 144 ER 1067 (HL)) and Turner v Spooner (1861) 30 LJ Ch 801 (Ch)), all of which discussed the opening of new windows overlooking neighbouring properties. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 3:56 pm
As Barnett explains: Spooner supplemented this interpretive claim about original public meaning with a principle of construction he took from the 1805 Supreme Court case of United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 4:48 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 9:43 am
" How could Ashley have made this statement four years after the United States Supreme Court declared a constitutional right to own slaves in the infamous decision of Dred Scott v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division sustained the lower court’s ruling.* Mari v Safir, 291 AD2d 298, sets out the general standards applied by the courts in resolving litigation resulting from conducting a disciplinary hearing in absentia.** Pursuant to Civil Service Law Section 76.4, many Taylor Law collective bargaining agreements provide that a permanent employee in the classified service may challenge a disciplinary action in accordance with the terms set out in a "contract disciplinary… [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 4:05 am
ALJ Spooner recommended that the disciplinary charges brought against Gaicia be dismissed and that he be reimbursed for the time he was suspended from his position without pay. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 2:30 am
Spooner sustained the charge and recommended 30-day suspension without pay. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
Spooner found the proof sufficient to sustain most of these charges. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
Posted on the Internet at: http://archive.citylaw.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/17/oath/15_cases/15-2231.pdf * See, also, Dep’t of Health & Mental Hygiene v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
For Children Services v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 10:00 am
DOITT v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 3:00 am
Fire Dep't v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 5:29 pm
Some even considered Barron v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 4:08 am
As the Court of Appeals indicated in New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs. v Lanterman, 14 NY3d 275, termination from the position because the individual does not possess a valid required license or certification is not a disciplinary termination. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 3:43 pm
Spooner Addition Water Co., 432 S.W.2d 515, 518 (Tex. 1968). [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
In Lee v. [read post]
