Search for: "Standard Oil Co. v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 470
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2015, 8:51 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Maple Drive Farms v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
  As stated in Moore’s Federal Practice, “The identity of class members must be ascertainable by reference to objective criteria. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 9:45 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
(Genus) purchased a Standard Fire and Special Perils Policy (Policy) from New India Assurance Co. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 2:32 pm by Marta Requejo
They reiterate that for a case to be given jurisdiction by ATS it must a) touch and concern the United States with sufficient force to displace the presumption against extraterritoriality and: b) demonstrate that the conduct, prima facie, breaches a law of nations or treaty of the United States. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 10:06 am by Schachtman
The common law, as it developed in the United States from the early 19th century, was hospitable to apportionments that avoided “entire” or “joint and several” liability. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 6:38 am by Benjamin Bissell
Wells promised that while he could not personally attend a two-day pre-trial hearing in the case of United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:49 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> Asarco LLC v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
Here is the relevant language from Best: “[A] doctor’s differential diagnosis is reliable and admissible where the doctor (1) objectively ascertains, to the extent possible, the nature of the patient’s injury…, (2) ‘rules in’ one or more causes of the injury using a valid methodology, and (3) engages in ‘standard diagnostic techniques by which doctors normally rule out alternative causes” to reach a conclusion as to which cause is most… [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 7:45 am by Schachtman
United States, 929 F.2d 1235, 1239 (8th Cir. 1991), decided before the Supreme Court decided Daubert.) [read post]
28 May 2014, 11:20 am by Steven Boutwell
The EPA’s stated reason for amending the petroleum refinery emission standards was to address the risk remaining after application of the standards promulgated in 1995 and 2002. [read post]