Search for: "Standard Oil Co. v. United States" Results 121 - 140 of 470
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2012, 6:25 pm by Jon L. Gelman
" The soldiers, in 2003, provided military protection to civilian teams who were working to restore operations as part of the Project Restore Iraqi Oil (RIO) on behalf of the United States. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 2:22 pm by Schachtman
Over 25 years ago, the United States Supreme Court answered a narrow legal question about whether the so-called Frye rule was incorporated into Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
ANALYZING THE LEGAL STANDARD Who counts as an officer of the United States? [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
” Recognizing that the Sherman Act could be read to bar all contracts, federal courts for over a century have interpreted the 1890 antitrust law only to apply to “unreasonable” restraints of trade.[7] The Supreme Court first adopted this concept in its landmark 1911 decision in Standard Oil, upholding the lower court’s dissolution of John D. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 2:25 pm by Orin Kerr
(cross-posted at Lawfare) I have blogged a lot over the last two years on the pending case of United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 2:21 pm by Orin Kerr
I have blogged a lot over the last two years on the pending case of United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 10:15 pm by Leland E. Beck
Circuit vacated the administrative decision in Mobil Pipe Line Co. v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 8:42 am by WIMS
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> Monroe Energy, LLC v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 8:56 am by WIMS
EPA Clean Water Rule: WOTUS Field Hearing #2: Impacts of the Proposed Waters of the United States Rule on State and Local Governments and Stakeholders Field Hearing #1: Impacts of the Proposed Waters of the United States Rule on State and Local Governments and Stakeholders <> Nation's first federal combined solar power purchase … [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 12:25 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The First and Ninth Circuits adopt a bright-line standard, where if “irrevocable liability” occurred in the United States, the transaction is “domestic” within the meaning of Morrison and Section 10(b) applies to the claim without further inquiry. [read post]