Search for: "Stanford v. Texas"
Results 201 - 220
of 457
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
In Miller v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 3:04 am
Commentary comes from Gregory Ablavsky, who discusses the case with Stanford Lawyer. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 2:54 am
In the Stanford Lawyer, Jane Schachter concludes that the case “will present an occasion for the Court—and especially Justice Kennedy—to reflect on” its 1992 decision in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 11:31 am
As Justice Stewart recounted in Stanford v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 3:45 am
’” In an essay for the Stanford Law Review Online, Michael Pierce discusses the Court’s recent decisions in Bond v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm
University of Texas the Court will address the admissions scheme at the University of Texas (UT). [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 6:46 pm
Then came Alice Corp. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 12:38 pm
University of Texas at Austin’s earlier trip to the Court. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
The case was Reynolds v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 7:33 am
The certified question concerns an issue of state law that no on-point precedent from the Supreme Court of Texas has resolved (Janvey v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 6:06 am
And in Michigan v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
In Glossip v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am
Commentary on last week’s decision in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 3:13 pm
Texas, striking down same-sex sodomy laws. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:39 am
Kali Borkoski rounded up early coverage of and commentary on Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:12 am
In the Stanford Lawyer, Jim Sonne discusses the Court’s recent decision in EEOC v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 8:32 am
That was until 1977, when the United States Supreme Court ruled in Bates v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 9:00 am
Coverage of the Court’s announcement that it will take on Evenwel v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm
Texas and this case. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 11:59 am
Colleen V. [read post]
