Search for: "Stanley v. City of New York" Results 1 - 20 of 127
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2012, 9:13 am by Daniel Hemli
(Morgan Stanley), claiming damages for antitrust violations resulting from an allegedly illegal swap agreement that allowed KeySpan to manipulate energy prices in the New York City electric generating capacity market (NYC Capacity Market), see Konefsky et al. v. [...] [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:58 pm
In February, the federal district court in New York City approved an antitrust consent decree (2011-1 Trade Cases ¶77,321), resolving allegations against KeySpan over the agreement, which effectively combined the economic interests of the two largest competitors in the New York City electric capacity market.A complaint against Morgan Stanley and the proposed consent decree were filed in the federal district court in New… [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 4:12 am
Videotape used in disciplinary hearing to rebut employee’s testimonyNYC Department of Corrections v Saint-Phard, OATH Index #172/11OATH Administrative Law Judge Faye Lewis found that Stanley Saint-Phard, a New York City correction officer, used impermissible force by dispersing a chemical agent in an inmate's face and placing him in a chokehold.Saint-Phard contended that the use of such force was justified because the inmate made an aggressive… [read post]
18 May 2015, 3:18 pm by Stephen Bilkis
TINO HERNANDEZ, as the Chairman of the NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, Respondent. 402276/04. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 6:50 am by Philip R. Stein
Scheindlin, Southern District of New York, rejected the contentions of Morgan Stanley & Co. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 2:23 pm by Mark Walsh
But companies are still sending junk snail mail, cable systems are still reserving channels for public-access shows (about, say, the best hot dogs in New York City, as Justice Stephen Breyer suggested in a hypothetical during arguments in Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 10:37 am by NCC Staff
This episode, recorded live in New York City at the Federal Bar Association’s 2018 annual convention, features a debate about the following question: “Should Chevron Be Overturned? [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:35 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
On behalf of the Mayor and the people of the City of Yonkers, we extend our gratitude to the U.S Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York and to the FBI New York Office for their support, cooperation, and collaboration in this investigation. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:35 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
On behalf of the Mayor and the people of the City of Yonkers, we extend our gratitude to the U.S Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York and to the FBI New York Office for their support, cooperation, and collaboration in this investigation. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:35 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
On behalf of the Mayor and the people of the City of Yonkers, we extend our gratitude to the U.S Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York and to the FBI New York Office for their support, cooperation, and collaboration in this investigation. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:35 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
On behalf of the Mayor and the people of the City of Yonkers, we extend our gratitude to the U.S Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York and to the FBI New York Office for their support, cooperation, and collaboration in this investigation. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 6:53 am by Antitrust Today
Keyspan Corp., 10 CIV. 5437 SAS (S.D.N.Y. 2011), challenged a derivative transaction – the “KeySpan Swap,” arranged by financial advisor Morgan Stanley – relating to New York City’s electric power generation market. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 1:19 pm by Tom Kosakowski
Born and raised in New York City, Ron lived in Harlem and Washington Heights. [read post]
22 May 2007, 1:09 am
City of New York, defendants-appellees NEW YORK COUNTYAdministrative LawDOH Decision Denying Petitioner Tobacco Bar Status Annulled, Remanded for New Determination Matter of 62nd & 1st LLC v. [read post]