Search for: "Starr v. United States"
Results 141 - 160
of 284
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2017, 2:26 pm
The land was divided into two units: 608 acres of state park land (Washoe Meadows State Park), and the remainder designated as Lake Valley State Recreation Area to allow continuing operation of an existing golf course (a use not allowed in state parks). [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 2:27 pm
The petition of the day is: Starr International Company, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 7:40 pm
The petition of the day is: Starr International Company, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 2:19 pm
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 2:19 pm
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 6:44 am
United States Department of the Interior (Land into Trust)Sturgeon v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
A person signing a DMCA notice must state a good faith belief that the use is not authorized, declare her authority to act under penalty of perjury, and risk damages for misrepresentation under section 512(f).[3] That source of protection has not technically disappeared, but its value is largely lost when notices are generated not by a person, but by a machine. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 2:33 pm
United States Department of the Interior (Land into Trust)Sturgeon v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 2:33 pm
United States Department of the Interior (Land into Trust)Sturgeon v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm
A person signing a DMCA notice must state a good faith belief that the use is not authorized, declare her authority to act under penalty of perjury, and risk damages for misrepresentation under section 512(f).[3] That source of protection has not technically disappeared, but its value is largely lost when notices are generated not by a person, but by a machine. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:13 pm
(Id., quoting Duran v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:13 pm
(Id., quoting Duran v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 5:05 am
Here’s Why That Won’t Happen.Center for Public Integrity – Sarah Kleiner | Published: 8/31/2017 Seizing on the specter of Russian election influence, Democrats have ramped up their quixotic effort to blunt Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
As the unanimous Court said in the 1974 Watergate Case, United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 12:27 pm
That is one of the central principles of the momentous Supreme Court decision, United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 3:25 am
” That memo cites a quote from an 1882 Supreme Court decision, United States v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 7:44 am
The American Bar Association's opinion on encryption only formalizes what a lot of us have been discussing for sometime, particularly given law firms' obvious status as targets for hackers.Dechert has a lengthy analysis, in case summary form, of the Ninth Circuit's opinion in United States v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 9:30 am
” As the district court noted in United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
There have been three landmark cases issued by the Supreme Court during the last generation or two concerning the extent to which the presidency and the executive branch should be immune from legal and judicial processes and orders that would require disclosure of executive information and/or consumption of executive time: the famous Nixon Tapes case, United States v. [read post]
