Search for: "State v. DeLuca"
Results 1 - 20
of 82
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2023, 8:00 pm
In the case of Estate of Joseph DeLuca v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 11:37 am
January 5, 2023 | By: Ryan Kennedy On November 7, 2022, the United States District Court for the District of Virginia decided the case of Harrell v. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 9:25 am
Relying on Rekemeyer v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 10:00 am
In DeLuca v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 11:04 am
DeLuca, 2010 WL 1709928 (D. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 7:52 pm
DeLuca and City of Long Branch v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 1:55 pm
Anonymity v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 9:37 am
” (Kluge v. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 3:03 pm
Deluca v Brown The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decided a case on April 3, 2018 that changed how the VA decides claims based solely upon pain. [read post]
2 May 2010, 7:59 am
DeLuca, 2010 WL 1709928 (D. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 3:55 pm
” Raesly v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 5:49 am
State v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of DeLuca v New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys., 48 AD3d 876, the Appellate Division explained that "[I]t is the Comptroller's duty to determine retirement service credits and his determination will be upheld by this Court if rational and supported by substantial evidence" and it is the claimant's burden to show that he or she is entitled to additional retirement member service credit.According to the decision,… [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of DeLuca v New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys., 48 AD3d 876, the Appellate Division explained that "[I]t is the Comptroller's duty to determine retirement service credits and his determination will be upheld by this Court if rational and supported by substantial evidence" and it is the claimant's burden to show that he or she is entitled to additional retirement member service credit.According to the decision,… [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 9:13 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 3:07 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 4:35 am
State v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 10:41 am
By Eric Goldman Murawski v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 5:00 am
In the case of DeLuca v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
