Search for: "State, in the Interest of Gc"
Results 1 - 20
of 688
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2024, 5:34 am
This prompted the GC to state that the relevant public would focus on the endings “DIN” and “id” given the descriptiveness of “sano” (§ 99). [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 9:00 am
GCs can monitor these developments with the Artificial Intelligence Legislation Tracker on Lexis+. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 1:18 am
Why are you interested in this position? [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 12:04 pm
In Memorandum GC 23-02, issued October 31, 2022, NLRB General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo discussed the potential implications of workplace electronic monitoring and algorithmic management under federal labor law. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 11:01 am
The RFQ specifically stated: “[i]f no qualified SDVOSB offers are received, it is possible other small businesses can be considered. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:45 am
While GC memoranda are not binding and do not represent the views of the Board or federal appellate courts, several complaints have adopted the GC’s theory. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:45 am
Despite the institutional and functional poly-crisis facing the WTO, it is interesting to note that the attractiveness of the multilateral trading system persists. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:45 am
Despite the institutional and functional poly-crisis facing the WTO, it is interesting to note that the attractiveness of the multilateral trading system persists. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 5:28 am
This is in the interest of legal certainty. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
Hat tip to the GC at a prominent Canadian firm for pointing me to this one (and a reminder to readers that pointers and links are always welcome!) [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 7:45 am
By decision of 24 January 2024 (T-537/22), the General Court of the European Union (GC) confirmed the validity of the Registered Community Design (RCD) by Lego A/S (Lego) “Building blocks from a toy building set” by stating that an RCD is invalid only if all its features are excluded from protection. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 5:40 am
Article 18 para. 2 AP II explicitly names “foodstuffs and medical supplies,” while article 23 para. 1 GC IV is more extensive, referring to “medical and hospital stores and objects necessary for religious worship” as well as “essential foodstuffs, clothing and tonics intended for children under fifteen, expectant mothers and maternity cases. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 3:29 am
On the GC’s point that, in its new decision, the BoA must pretend it’s still 2020, the AG does not endorse the GC’s position, stating, however, that the effects of Brexit are for the BoA and not the GC to assess (§ 90). [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 6:17 am
The State of the E-Discovery Industry, with Doug Austin. 6. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 11:32 am
Whether she does or not, it is going to be interesting to see if and how DDJ Wright’s ratio is applied by the courts going forward. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 5:29 am
Vanderbilt Law School recently launched an exciting new initiative called the Vanderbilt AI Legal Lab (VAILL) to explore how artificial intelligence can transform legal services and access to justice. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 7:02 am
Additionally, Abruzzo stated that the Board would no longer accept any claim to a legitimate reliance interest by an employer based on an expectation of being able to engage in some degree of unlawful conduct without triggering a bargaining order. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 10:26 pm
That right might therefore be overridden by a state body, provided there was a sufficiently pressing need to do so for one of the purposes in Article 9(2) and the means used were both lawful and proportionate, applying the four-stage proportionality test in Bank Mellat v Her Majesty’s Treasury (No 2) (SC(E)) [2014] AC 700 [at 20] and allowing the state body an appropriate discretionary area of judgment. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 10:42 am
The NLRB’s General Counsel (GC) may bring administrative cases against employers. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 6:11 am
That’s similar to the US, but we also have state by state restrictions. [read post]
