Search for: "State Bar Grievance Administrator v. Jackson"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
However, his application for disability benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law §207-c was denied, which administrative determination was affirmed by the Appellate Division [see Matter of Jackson v Barber, 133 AD3d 958].In August 2013, Jacksonsubmitted a physician's note stating that, as a result of his foot condition, he was restricted from working more than 40 hours and 35 minutes per week. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 4:06 am
Jackson v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
Jackson, 152 AD2d 54]. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
Jackson, 152 AD2d 54]. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:03 pm
” The act allows states broad enforcement authority, limits federal enforcement, and grants residents internal grievance procedures funneled to the same state authorities. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:22 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 9:14 am
http://j.st/GqZ United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm
Five years later, in Franklin v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:58 am
[Click on citation to access the opinion.]Skilling v United States (Dkt No 08-1394). [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am
The moral imperative to defer to the authority of the Court, the potential legal jeopardy of supporting acts that plausibly violate the Genocide Convention, and the strategic implications of being seen to do so should be sufficient for the Biden administration to make a radical course change. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
Compare the provisions of Articles I-III with the list of grievances interposed in the Declaration of Independence considered in Part II of these materials. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
Jackson, docket 10-871). [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:55 am
U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, May 12, 2008 Jackson v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am
No one disputes that Article I, Section 9 would bar the Secretaries from “draw[ing]” funds from the Treasury if the Executive’s statutory interpretation turns out to be mistaken. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
State of Tennessee, No. 06-6208 In civil rights suit alleging that city police discriminated against plaintiffs in violation of the Ame [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:27 am
According to the majority, "[t]he decision to fashion a [collective bargaining agreement] to require arbitration of employment-discrimination claims is no different from the many other decisions made by parties in designing grievance machinery. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am
At minimum, bribery covers not just the taking but the giving of a bribe, and state of mind is key. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 6:23 pm
The recent Parker v. [read post]
