Search for: "State Employees v. Community College" Results 1 - 20 of 940
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2015, 5:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Empls., Inc. v Levy, 2015 NY Slip Op 08181, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentA number of individuals employed by the Suffolk Community College represented by Suffolk County Association of Municipal Employees [SCAME], an employee organization representing employees of Suffolk County including those at the College, had been permitted to participate in the Suffolk County Public Employees Deferred Compensation Plan [County… [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 4:11 am
Employee charging employer did not appoint him because of age required to show that the employer's reasons given for rejecting him were pretextualSaia v Suffolk County Community College, 2009 NY Slip Op 05851, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentThe Appellate Division dismissed Robert Saia's appeal in which he sought to recover damages for alleged discrimination in employment on the basis of age in violation of Executive Law §296, the… [read post]
Hostrop held that a state statute, 110 ILCS 805/3-32, superseded the Millikin rule by allowing the board of a community college district to establish tenure policies for teachers and administrative personnel. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 6:35 am
Maricopa County Community College Dist., found that transgender employees claiming employment discrimination on that basis can state a sex stereotyping claim under Title VII. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:24 am
Court annuls Commissioner of Human Rights' determination because it lacked substantial evidence to support a finding of unlawful discriminationMatter of Suffolk County Community Coll. v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 61 AD3d 881The Commissioner of the New York State Division of Human found Suffolk County Community College had engaged in unlawful racially discriminatory practices against one of its employees and retaliated… [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 12:11 pm by Ruthann Robson
Franks, authored by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, the Court concluded that Edward Lane, an employee at a community college program, possessed First Amendment protection for his testimony in a criminal prosecution resulting from fraud in that program. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:18 am by mortimer
Most written communications to or from state/university employees and students are public records and available to the public and media upon request. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 7:00 am by Andrew
  The Court of Appeals concluded that the plaintiff was covered by the Whistleblower Act because it covers “all State employees, public school employees, and community college employees. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 2:13 pm by Ruthann Robson
Franks held that Edward Lane, an employee at a community college program, had no First Amendment protection for his subpoenaed testimony. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 11:19 pm
The Chancellor of the State University of New York if such person is to be employed in the unclassified service of the State University, by a statutory contract colleges at Cornell and Alfred Universities or in the unclassified service of a community college other than those in the city of New York; orf. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 4:00 am
The Chancellor of the State University of New York if such person is to be employed in the unclassified service of the State University, by a statutory contract colleges at Cornell and Alfred Universities or in the unclassified service of a community college other than those in the city of New York; orf. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 6:55 am by Joy Waltemath
Here, a probationary director of a community college program, despite warnings not to do so when he raised the issue internally, fired a state representative who was getting paid to work for the program but was not in fact working. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 10:26 am by Ruthann Robson
 In 2006, soon after Edward Lane became the director of a program for at-risk youth at Central Alabama Community College (CACC), he looked at the program’s finances. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 11:06 am
Maricopa County Community College Dist.(9th Cir. 4/14/09) [pdf] it found itself following the 6th Circuit's 2004 decision that transgendered employees can state a claim under Title VII on a sex stereotyping theory.In Kastl it was a male to female employee who was barred from using the female restroom. [read post]