Search for: "State Ex Rel. Cox v. Cox"
Results 1 - 20
of 35
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2024, 5:52 am
" State ex rel. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
How Jack Smith May Charge Trump PAC with Fraudulent Fundraising Within the Bounds of First Amendment
24 Aug 2023, 5:55 am
In Hansen, the Court reaffirmed a case from the Rehnquist Court, Illinois ex rel. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm
" People ex Rel. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 3:44 pm
All this is ex parte. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:09 am
Attorney General (a/k/a NetChoice v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm
Mar. 3, 2014); Doe ex rel. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm
Mar. 3, 2014); Doe ex rel. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
Howell raised questions about why some defendants were being permitted to resolve their criminal cases by pleading guilty to a misdemeanor and why the amount of money prosecutors are seeking to recover through those plea deals was based on a relatively paltry estimate of about $1.5 million in damages caused by the rioters. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am
” “[P]arents may create an enforceable agreement for modification of child support only by petitioning the court for support modification and then establishing, to the satisfaction of the court, that an agreement reached between the parents is in accord with the best interests of the children” Blisset v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 5:01 am
State Col [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
Ex. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:11 am
BMG v Cox is good, but music industry is still unhappy. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 11:31 am
The notice is a way for the parties to fight.Greenberg: relatively few counternotices are filed; abusive counternotices exist too. 512(f) case of Johnson v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 12:08 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:41 am
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (COX, J.) [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 12:48 pm
” McElmoyle ex rel. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:30 pm
But, by the end of the 1800s, this rationale lost currency, and by 1917 (in Bowman v Secular Society [1917] AC 406), the House of Lords held that blasphemy protected the religious sensitivities of the individual; but the courts still confined the scope of the offence to the established Church (this was confirmed as recently as 1991 in R v Chief Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Choudhury [1991] 1 QB 429). [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:06 am
The cohort was followed for a median of 6.6 years, in which time there were 154 cases of ovarian cancer, available for analysis using Cox’s proportional hazards model. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 10:48 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
