Search for: "State Ex Rel. Moore v. Doe" Results 61 - 74 of 74
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2024, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
Town of Smyrna, 959 F.3d 678 (6th Cir. 2020) (stating that “absolute immunity [does] not apply to a prosecutor’s advice to law enforcement regarding the existence of probable cause”); Ewing v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 9:33 am by Christopher Tyner
  The trial court did not err by failing to intervene ex mero motu with respect to an alleged misstatement of law regarding the aggressor doctrine in the prosecutor’s closing argument; the trial court did not err by instructing the jury on murder by lying in wait State v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:35 pm by Chris Attig
However, when the clear writing of Congress does not clearly apply to a given fact situation, it is said that Congress’s words are ambiguous. [read post]
  The Court stated that a term will only be implied if it satisfies the case of “business necessity” or it is “so obvious that it goes without saying”. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am by Schachtman
United States[13], the district court refused to enforce plaintiff’s Rule 45 subpoena that sought documents from defendant’s expert witness. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
Respectfully, we also write to raise serious concerns about the reliability of Professor Lash's writings on Section 3 and to make clear what the historical record does—and does not—say.[1] By answering seven questions, we will show that (1) there was a First Insurrection, (2) John B. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:19 pm by Zuri Blackmon
For example, if you ask a state tax officer when were the assessments? [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:39 pm by Glenn
Both are commodities with steadily falling prices, per Moore’s law, in today’s economy. [read post]