Search for: "State Highway Department v. Roberts" Results 1 - 20 of 139
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2019, 12:48 pm by Bethany Berger
With a three-justice plurality opinion, a two-justice concurrence in the judgment and two dissents, Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:42 am by Bethany Berger
The oral argument on Tuesday in Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:31 pm by David Kopel
The five percent of federal highway funds cut in South Dakota v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:03 pm by Josh Blackman
Roberts explains that Secretary Duke was "bound by the Attorney General's legal determination" concerning Texas v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:41 am by Welcome
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, Respondent. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 5:03 am by SHG
In a post at Slate, my buddy Cristian Farias writes about Chief Justice John Roberts’ cute quip during oral argument in Rodriquez v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 11:16 am by Suzanna Sherry
Maine (an earlier state sovereign immunity case) and District of Columbia v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 6:00 am
Louis County Police with the State Highway Patrol to try and stem violence in Ferguson? [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:49 am by Lawrence Solum
Justice Clark read his opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:20 am by Dan Gauss
The tracking happened before the Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 2:36 am
But if Monday's oral arguments are any guide, the Justice Department may soon have to actually prove money laundering to gain a money laundering conviction, not just that someone was hiding cash.Chief Justice Roberts' retort to the state that his suitcase is for carrying his clothes, not concealing them, calls into question the whole tactic of trolling the highways looking for drug money couriers. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:26 am by Joseph McClelland
Kachwalla, 274 Ga. 886, 561 SE2d 403 (2002)]; • Court need not charge jury “incapable of driving safely” language in a “less safe”case [State v. [read post]