Search for: "State Medical Society v. Comm. of Insurance"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2021, 9:25 am
The AMA wants, however, to remind us that non-adherence may result from “frustration and legitimate mistrust of health care, structural barriers that limit availability and accessibility of medications (including cost, insurance barriers and pharmacy deserts), time and resource constraints (including work hours, family responsibilities), and lack of effective communication about severity of disease or symptoms. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:41 pm
” But most medical authorities, including the cancer society and the National Cancer Institute, see no such link. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am
In two split decisions, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania held that an employer and/or workers’ compensation insurer may be required to reimburse an injured employee for the cost of his or her medical marijuana use pursuant to the state’s Medical Marijuana Act (MMA) where such use has been adjudged “reasonable and necessary” under the state’s Workers’ Compensation Act (“WC Act”) despite language in… [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
United Kingdom (1980), 3 E.H.R.R. 408 (Comm.), at p. 415, applied in Re F (in utero), supra. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
Western States Medical Center, 535 U.S. 357, 374 (2002). [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 4.0) 1. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 7:42 am
[23] V. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 1:21 pm
Different on medical benefit (physician-administered) side from pharmacy benefit side. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
Twice, the Supreme Court has stated that it wishes to consider this question.The first occasion was in Marek v. [read post]
