Search for: "State Of Washington, Respondent V. C. V. , Appellant" Results 61 - 80 of 181
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am by Maureen Johnston
Washington under Section 2254(d)(1); and (3) whether the lower court misapplied Harrington v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:08 am by Joel R. Brandes
 The Appellate Division observed that pursuant to Domestic Relations Law ' 240(1Bb)(c)(7), the court may direct a parent to contribute to a child=s education. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 2:09 pm
Washington responded that he had marijuana in his front pocket. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 2:13 pm by John Paul Schnapper-Casteras
John Paul Schnapper-Casteras is Special Counsel for Appellate and Supreme Court Advocacy at the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund in Washington, D.C. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
 The evidence establishes the implanting physicians were integrally involved in determining which implants to use, as appellants relied on them to choose the appropriate implant and give them information regarding the surgery and the product. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am by Amy Howe
  First up is Wittman v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:03 am by Jelle Hoekstra
Document D1 was therefore comprised in the state of the art according to Article 54(3) EPC.The opposition division further held that claim 1 of the first and second auxiliary requests filed during the oral proceedings before the opposition division on 7 December 2010 did not contain subject-matter which extended beyond the content of the application as filed (Article 100(c) EPC in combination with Article 123(2) EPC), but that the subject-matter of said claims did not involve an… [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am by John Elwood
United States, 19-5652,Smith v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014) Since 2010, I have been posting on the development of a new course I have been developing for our first year law school students, "Elements of Law. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 12:43 pm by John Elwood
CODE §31-13-13, prohibiting a state’s residents from: (a) concealing or harboring aliens who are present in the United States in violation of federal law; (b) encouraging or inducing aliens to enter into or reside in the state, when their entry or residence would violate federal law; or (c) transporting unlawfully present aliens within the state in furtherance of their unlawful presence. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
The first was United States v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Case No.: 6:07-cv-839-Orl-35-KRS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et. al., Respondents. [read post]