Search for: "State Of Washington, Respondent V. I. K. C., Appellant" Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2022, 8:24 am by Josh Blackman
I've now finished reading Oklahoma v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 7:42 am by Rachel Bercovitz
(For those who are interested, United States v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 4:35 am by jonathanturley
Then to make the week complete, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 6:05 am
Personally, I'd rather pay the few extra bucks and keep my skull;And finally:Blawg Review #123 is up at Texas Appellate Law blog;Grand Rounds is up at Rickety Contrivances of Doing Good, for those with medical interests;The Cavalcade of Risk is hosted this week by Health Affairs;Food poisoning legal guru Bill Marler is the focus of a long (and flattering) magazine profile;Trial Ad Notes reports that B-List and C-List celebrities seek new life on Jury Duty, coming to… [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Both the appellant (in both cases) and respondent II in T 1513/17 requested, inter alia, that questions concerning the validity of priority rights be referred to the Enlarged Board. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
”  The customer checks were supposed to be deposited into a special Hantz broker-dealer (k)(2)(i) account, which according to Hantz’s Senior Vice President of Tax and Business, meant that the funds were not in Hantz’s possession. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Stored Communications Act (SCA), which is part of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA),[9] has been interpreted by at least two U.S. courts to forbid production of stored data of certain types only where the data are stored in the United States.[10]  With respect to U.S. foreign intelligence surveillance, the rules are much more complex,[11] but unlike the Wiretap Act and the SCA, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act[12] generally prohibits conduct only by persons… [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 1:30 pm by Matthew Scott Johnson
Rev. 225, 226–27 (1998), was cited by the Fourth District Appellate Court of Illinois in Illinois State Bar Ass’n Mut. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:59 am by Jonathan Shaub
And only one appellate court—during the unique circumstances of the Watergate scandal—has ever resolved the merits of such a dispute. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
: IPO announces public consultation on trade mark fees (BLOG@IP::JUR) (Class 46) (Class 46) (Class 46) (Out-Law) (IPKat) US Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Patent Reform Act 2009 (Inventive Step) (Patent Prospector) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Law360) (Hal Wegner)   Global Global - General The global economic crisis and the intellectual property ecosystem IP Think Tank podcast 6 March 2009 (IP Think Tank)… [read post]