Search for: "State Plant Board v. Smith" Results 1 - 20 of 56
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2015, 11:11 am
  * Impulse trade mark registration: no sweat, as AG gives his viewJeremy reports on the Opinion of Advocate General Wahl in Case C‑125/14 Iron & Smith Kft v Unilever NV, a request for a preliminary ruling by the CJEU from the Budapest Municipal Court. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 11:31 am
Let's see what the Secretary for State says.Something to read? [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
| Plant variety in Case C‑242/14 | US Supreme Court on spiderman patent | Hospira v Genentech saga | Are EU policy-makers fighting the right copyright battles? [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
  Anyway, if you were otherwise engaged when the Kat-bloggers were a-bloggin',this is what you missed:* EPO Enlarged Board tells Chairman: "disobey President when necessary"The EPO's Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) issued an interlocutory decision in Case R2/14, in which it addressed the dual roles of the Board's Chairman, who is also a Vice-President of the Office (VP3), among other issues. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am by David Wagner
This post is based on input and analysis from Reed Smith attorneys across the United States. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 6:15 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The Board correctly determined that the mature oak trees found by Beineke in the front yard of a home were not entitled to plant patent protection under section 161. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 5:33 am by Matthew Waxman, Samuel Weitzman
Every student of national security law knows about Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 2:50 am by Amy Howe
Today the Court will hear oral arguments in just one case:  United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 3:02 pm by SteinMcewen, LLP
Smith (R-TX) on March 30, 2011, the first significant change to the United States patent system has arrived. [read post]