Search for: "State Railroad Tax Cases" Results 81 - 100 of 446
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2019, 10:00 am by Michelle Ghetti
In 2016 alone, 11.5 million people took 147 million trips to hunt within the United States, generating more than $27 billion in spending, nearly $2 billion in federal tax revenue and $1.6 billion in state and local tax revenue. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:03 am by Samuel Bray
A federal statute prohibited discriminatory state taxes on interstate railroads, and the first three provisions of the statute explicitly indicated that the relevant comparison was to general commercial and industrial taxpayers. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:46 am by Josh Blackman
Indeed, the United States attempted and failed to make such a showing in Grupo Mexicano. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 9:05 pm by Herbert Hovenkamp
This view harkens back to a nineteenth century tort law concept that was widely used by courts to limit tort liability, particularly in railroad cases. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 5:49 am by David M. Benenfeld, P.A.
That pay cut sounds scary, but one piece of good news is that these benefits are not taxed. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm by Martha Moore
The law stated that “competition and the demand for services” should drive rail transportation markets to help make railroads far more efficient and financially strong. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
The tax is levied generally on “coverage providers” who pay the tax with respect to an employee, though a coverage provider can be either a health insurance company issuing an employer-sponsored plan or, in some cases, the employer. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 12:04 pm by Emily Everson
Bills have been introduced in the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives, S. 203 and H.R. 510 respectively, to permanently extend the tax credit for railroad track maintenance, which would apply to expenditures paid or incurred during tax years beginning after 2017. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
"[I]f an individual announces that he intends to express his disapproval of the Internal Revenue Service by refusing to pay his income taxes," id., that announcement offers no basis for applying First Amendment scrutiny to the nonpayment of taxes. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 9:58 am by Amy Howe
The case before the Supreme Court was filed by victims of the 1998 attacks and their family members against Sudan, which was designated a state sponsor of terrorism in 1993. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 1:40 pm by Ashley Tabrizi
We can take either the Europe Express or the Trans-Siberian railroad”. [read post]
The court’s opinion stated that a railroad worker’s award of lost wages could not be a sum from which the worker was required to pay taxes because the relevant tax law only required withholding on “services rendered,” and an award of lost wages, by definition, could not be money paid for the actual performance of services. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 9:14 am by Rick Pildes
Tipaldo, minimum-wage laws on the books in a third of the states, in some cases, for decades. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 8:53 am by Joy Waltemath
” The majority’s decision, he asserted, may “mean that employees will pay a tax for going to trial—and railroads will succeed in buying cheaper settlements in the future at the bargain basement price of a few thousand dollars in excise taxes in one case today. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
Loos, the court held 7-2 that a railroad’s payment to an employee for time lost from work is taxable compensation under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 3:25 pm by Daniel Hemel
The narrow question in the case is whether a railroad’s payment to an employee for lost wages due to an on-the-job injury is taxable “compensation” under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 1:10 pm by Mark Walsh
Loos, which holds that a railroad’s payment to an employee for working time lost due to an on-the-job injury is taxable “compensation” under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 12:30 pm by John K. Ross
The rail beds should be exempt, too; the ordinance violates a federal law prohibiting discriminatory taxes against railroads. [read post]