Search for: "State ex rel. Peoples v. Johnson" Results 1 - 20 of 91
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2014, 12:15 pm
Johnson (Jerrold Elwin) [Automatic Appeal] (justice pro tempore to be assigned)2:00 P.M.(4) S214221 State of California ex rel. [read post]
One of the more recent and aggressive shifts in state tax administration has been the rise of the state False Claims Act, or FCA, tax lawsuit. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Pentagon General Counsel Jeh Johnson is giving a speech today at the Yale Law School. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
We've already deplored the recent decision of the West Virginia Supreme Court rejecting the learned intermediary rule outright, State ex rel. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am by Edward Craven, Matrix Chambers.
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 9:09 am by Eric Goldman
Photo credit: 3D Quick Link Crossword // ShutterStock * Burge ex rel. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 12:10 am
Diaz, defendants NEW YORK COUNTYInsurance LawAG's Complaint Against Bank for Violations Of Executive Law Fails to State Cause of Action People v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:06 am by Schachtman
Many people understand the state’s nickname to mean that Missourians are not gullible.3 The reality of the origins of the Missouri nickname may well be different. [read post]
21 May 2015, 4:43 am by Dave
All of this tended to justify the subsequent authorities – R v Basingstoke and Deane BC ex p Bassett (1983) 10 HLR 125; R v Brent LBC ex p Awua; R v Harrow LBC ex p Fahia; R v Camden LBC ex p Aranda (1997) 30 HLR 76; R v Hackney LBC ex p Ajayi (1997) 30 HLR 473 – in which different acts were said to have broken (or had the potential to break) the chain of… [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:41 am by Charles Johnson
Houston Criminal Lawyer Charles Johnson provides a strong defense to conspiracy charges at both the state and federal level. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am by Giles Peaker
On ‘fend for oneself’, while this might have been useful in the context of R v Waveney DC ex p Bowers [1983] QB 238, 244H, “it is not the statutory test, and at least to some people a person may be vulnerable even though he can fend for himself”. [read post]