Search for: "State ex rel. v. Family Life Services"
Results 1 - 20
of 115
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2013, 12:44 pm
The Court reasoned that FEGLIA is “strikingly similar” to the National Service Life Insurance Act of 1940 (NSLIA) and the Servicemen’s Group Life Insurance Act of 1965 (SGLIA) – both of which, the Court has previously held, preempt state laws similar to Section D. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 11:22 am
ex rel. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 12:22 pm
“Where the trial court does not have personal jurisdiction over a party, any order against him is void” Department of Healthcare & Family Services ex rel. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 10:40 am
Rel. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 8:44 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:49 am
United States ex rel Rigsby, which involves the effect on a lawsuit under the False Claims Act of a violation of the act’s seal requirements; Ronald Mann previewed the case for this blog. [read post]
12 May 2021, 9:14 am
But when you are a family lawyer representing clients through a divorce, they probably are less excited by the dollars and cents they may need to pay their soon-to-be-ex-spouse to fully divide their property. [read post]
9 May 2014, 6:36 pm
People ex rel. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 5:42 pm
Near the end of its opinion in Betancourt v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 10:13 am
” Monasky v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 4:02 am
Media Reports of Family Courts Case and Family Justice Issues The Express (and the Jersey Evening Post) reported with: Too many babies taken to hospital by parents are put into council care, says ex-MP The reports featured the claim by ‘family justice campaigner’ John Hemming that a 4 week old baby has been removed to care due to nothing more than his parents taking him to hospital for a twitch. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 4:27 am
(Messenger ex rel. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 1:35 pm
In Bowen v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 6:35 pm
Traditional "Abuse" Under the Family Code: Under two relatively new cases, all of the conduct described above is "abuse" as interpreted by appellate courts through Family Code §§ 6203, 6320 (herein "FC"). [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:29 am
Marks ex rel. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 6:58 pm
First, Troxel v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
”Later in the same term, Justice Kennedy, again writing for the Court, again invoked the similarity between jury service and voting, this time to support the proposition that peremptory challenges by private litigants may constitute state action. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:52 am
” In addressing this issue, Eady J referred to Attorney-General v Guardian Newspapers (No 2) [1990] 1 AC 109, where the House of Lords had drawn a distinction between state secrets and confidential information relating to an individual’s private life. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Evans v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 9:58 pm
Further, OBRA ‘93 authorized states to disqualify persons for transfers not only for the portion of Medicaid that pays for nursing home care, but also for home health care, personal care services, or community supported living arrangements.(1) Safe harbors, however, have been created for four categories of transfers, and other categories may exist under state regulations or practice. [read post]
